PallyDog
Title: WoW Vault Staff Teh Pyckles!
Posts:
13,429
Registered:
Mar 4, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 13,007
User ID: 776,236
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
So I'm making one.
I've beat the game on Prince level and haven't made it past that. I'm usually Ghengis Khan or Roosevelt. I prefer the fractual map type, although sometimes I do lakes. I'm almost always Russia (Katherine of course) I've made a Pyckle Empire. Cities named Pycklestien, St Pycklesburg, Gerkin, Vlasyk, etc. I always name my cities according to location and objective. For example Jarr usually has a central location and barrack and wells and produced the majority of my troops. Pycklestein, St Pycklesburg and Pycklestow are usually my cultural centers with Pycklestow being by the water.
Favorite troop? Cossack of course! Horse nut. /shrug
-----signature-----
"Pallys are simply self healing rocks." - IndridCole
|
Link to this post
|
Chickennugget101
Title: [face_peace] =+2
Posts:
12,598
Registered:
Feb 5, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 12,008
User ID: 767,206
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
I usually play on emperor. I'm a huge fan of pericles, or any of the cheese financial civs. Big n Small is an awesome map type, but I like fractual and pangaea and continents as well. A big thing going into the harder difficulties is managing the first like 50 turns perfectly(right tile usage, and unit builds), and learning not to spam buildings/wonders. Also city specialization is really important.. hammer/military city, food/GPP city, commerce/wall street or academy city. The game is so darned complicated that I'm unsure why it's so fun.
-----signature-----
Windwick
|
Link to this post
|
Chickennugget101
Title: [face_peace] =+2
Posts:
12,598
Registered:
Feb 5, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 12,008
User ID: 767,206
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Oh and favorite troop.. cannon of course. Liberalism--> steel slingshot.
-----signature-----
Windwick
|
Link to this post
|
Rhylith_Galahad
Posts:
2,819
Registered:
Aug 4, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 1,931
User ID: 828,072
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
You know, I don't think I ever played a civ game.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
Chickennugget101
Title: [face_peace] =+2
Posts:
12,598
Registered:
Feb 5, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 12,008
User ID: 767,206
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Rhylith_Galahad posted: You know, I don't think I ever played a civ game.
You should give it a try. There are so many facets to the game(city management, troop management, worker/improvement management, diplomacy, expanding, which way to go up the technology tree(which is huge), the attitude of all the leaders(shaka is an ass, ghandi is a pussy), and the list goes on and on). I spent a lot of time lurking over at civfanatics and watching/reading other's let's plays. There's a lot of little things that you'd have never thought of if you didn't watch someone else do it(like when to whip with slavery). http://forums.civfanatics.com/
-----signature-----
Windwick
|
Link to this post
|
Rhylith_Galahad
Posts:
2,819
Registered:
Aug 4, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 1,931
User ID: 828,072
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Chickennugget101 posted:
Rhylith_Galahad posted: You know, I don't think I ever played a civ game.
You should give it a try. There are so many facets to the game(city management, troop management, worker/improvement management, diplomacy, expanding, which way to go up the technology tree(which is huge), the attitude of all the leaders(shaka is an ass, ghandi is a pussy), and the list goes on and on). I spent a lot of time lurking over at civfanatics and watching/reading other's let's plays. There's a lot of little things that you'd have never thought of if you didn't watch someone else do it(like when to whip with slavery). http://forums.civfanatics.com/
It's on steam right? Wait do I want 5 or 4?
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
Chickennugget101
Title: [face_peace] =+2
Posts:
12,598
Registered:
Feb 5, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 12,008
User ID: 767,206
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Def 4. Civ5 sucks big floppy donkey... well you get the picture.
-----signature-----
Windwick
|
Link to this post
|
Rhylith_Galahad
Posts:
2,819
Registered:
Aug 4, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 1,931
User ID: 828,072
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Ok I'll do it when I get back from pax east.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
Chickennugget101
Title: [face_peace] =+2
Posts:
12,598
Registered:
Feb 5, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 12,008
User ID: 767,206
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Word, if you have any questions just ask, it's a pretty in-depth game.
-----signature-----
Windwick
|
Link to this post
|
KappenWizzbang
Title: Reverend Blue Jeans
Posts:
4,563
Registered:
Jan 30, '04
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 3,802
User ID: 889,176
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
I would play but most of my time would probably be spent in the red light district of Gherkin. Also, isn't "Gandhi is a pussy" on Churchill's grave?
-----signature-----
It's such a waste to be wasted in the first place I wanna taste the taste of being face to face with common grace To meditate on the warmest dream And when I walk alone, I listen to our secret theme
|
Link to this post
|
Amurdora
Title: Scourge of Nsaney
Posts:
1,065
Registered:
Aug 19, '04
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 941
User ID: 957,305
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
I play Civ 5 and Alpha Centauri. I wish they would come up with a system to make the hard difficulties actually difficult rather than just increase the production rate and other cheats for the NPCs. Otherwise they are awesome games.
-----signature-----
Amurdora Voltagex Amur (insert something stupid here)
|
Link to this post
|
PallyDog
Title: WoW Vault Staff Teh Pyckles!
Posts:
13,429
Registered:
Mar 4, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 13,007
User ID: 776,236
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Rhylith_Galahad posted: You know, I don't think I ever played a civ game.
Give it a try, seriously. Go grab Civ IV, you can get the whole package for cheap now and it's hella addicting.
-----signature-----
"Pallys are simply self healing rocks." - IndridCole
|
Link to this post
|
Daimar
Title: Moderator DAoC Knight - Generalist
Posts:
57,526
Registered:
Nov 5, '04
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 47,007
User ID: 987,256
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
I haven't played Civ 4 in years, I should really try it again. I got Civ 5 and boy was that ever a waste. I enjoyed Alpha Centauri a lot because you could customize units and I guess the Sci-fi stuff was a good hook too. My favorite 4x type of game is Master of Orion, I still crack out a game or two of both 1 and 2 every couple of months.
-----signature-----
LGM Tailor x3, SC x3, AC x3, WC x3, Alch x3, Fletch http://gimpchimp.etilader.com/s.php?u=daimar babies cry a lot, but then they smile at you and you stop throwing them into the wall. - Goatstar
|
Link to this post
|
Chickennugget101
Title: [face_peace] =+2
Posts:
12,598
Registered:
Feb 5, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 12,008
User ID: 767,206
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Master of Orion is also awesome.
-----signature-----
Windwick
|
Link to this post
|
Elkad
Title: aka Ebenezer
Posts:
8,058
Registered:
Sep 11, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 7,478
User ID: 837,586
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Post a save you are having trouble with. Preferably the initial (4000BC) save as well. I win Monarch regularly, and Immortal if I put some effort into it. Or if you go post on civfanatics in the strategy forum, you'll get a few dozen posters who are all better than me. I play so little single-player that I don't have things like peaceweights for various leaders memorized. And there are hordes of games with details the whole way to read about. Winning past Prince just takes a few things. Build more workers. Learn to love the whip. Stop building wonders. Specialize a couple cities.
-----signature-----
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty, than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson
|
Link to this post
|
Elkad
Title: aka Ebenezer
Posts:
8,058
Registered:
Sep 11, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 7,478
User ID: 837,586
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Amurdora posted: I play Civ 5 and Alpha Centauri. I wish they would come up with a system to make the hard difficulties actually difficult rather than just increase the production rate and other cheats for the NPCs. Otherwise they are awesome games.
Civ4 has a mod called Better AI that makes it play MUCH stronger. Enough that they toned down some of the NPC cheats in the higher levels.
-----signature-----
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty, than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson
|
Link to this post
|
Chickennugget101
Title: [face_peace] =+2
Posts:
12,598
Registered:
Feb 5, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 12,008
User ID: 767,206
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Elkad posted: Post a save you are having trouble with. Preferably the initial (4000BC) save as well. I win Monarch regularly, and Immortal if I put some effort into it. Or if you go post on civfanatics in the strategy forum, you'll get a few dozen posters who are all better than me. I play so little single-player that I don't have things like peaceweights for various leaders memorized. And there are hordes of games with details the whole way to read about. Winning past Prince just takes a few things. Build more workers. Learn to love the whip. Stop building wonders. Specialize a couple cities.
All great advice, but it's all timing. You can build wonders, but all in veeeery certain circumstances. But, I'm also willing to evaluate saves, like they do on civfanatics, and help with "crap i've lost" circumstances. Biggest thing: dont underestimate workers. You want a lot of them.
-----signature-----
Windwick
|
Link to this post
|
Elkad
Title: aka Ebenezer
Posts:
8,058
Registered:
Sep 11, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 7,478
User ID: 837,586
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
It's been a joke several times. Guy is reporting on a game, and early on he says "I build my first wonder - 28 Chariots!" Wonders are a luxury. Excepting Oracle, Taj Mahal, and Hanging Gardens, it's better to build a stack of shiny maces instead. All the other wonders work fine when you take them from somebody else. Buildings are the same. I tried to build every building in every city when I played Prince. Now a lot of them spend half the game with a Granary, Courthouse, and either a Library+University or Barracks+Forge
-----signature-----
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty, than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson
|
Link to this post
|
Chickennugget101
Title: [face_peace] =+2
Posts:
12,598
Registered:
Feb 5, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 12,008
User ID: 767,206
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Yeah usually it's more hammer effecient to build military and take the wonder you want.. but, some you can easily integrate into your strategy(oracle,taj,kremlin etc). Or if you have a neighbor that goes the music line first, and you plan on going to war with them, denying them statue of zeus is pretty key. It's a horribly wonder, but sucks so bad when the enemy has it. I usually only build granary->culture building(unless i'm creative), then put the city on building wealth.. Unless I have every city spamming tanks or cavalry or something then they get barracks.. Only specialized cities will get the forge, rax, library, uni etc.. Unless it's a game where I just have 6 cities, then you need 6 libraries and universities for oxford etc. I'm a huge fan of Great People economy. You can bulb the crap out of early game although cottages will benefit more later. But the bulbing allows you a fast liberalism(if you can diplo right and stay out of war), which you can grab a key military tech with. Turn off science and spam cannons, or cavalary, or whatever you happen to get. (tech liberalism till 1 turn left, then check the diplo screen every turn to know when the enemies can finish it).
-----signature-----
Windwick
|
Link to this post
|
Zavitz
Title: You stink, and that's sad ]=
Posts:
19,709
Registered:
Apr 18, '04
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 11,196
User ID: 915,771
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
This game sounds too confusing, and I used to play SM:Alpha Centauri when I was in elementary school.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
Chickennugget101
Title: [face_peace] =+2
Posts:
12,598
Registered:
Feb 5, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 12,008
User ID: 767,206
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
The game is very confusing.. but most of that stuff is just for when you want to move up in difficulty. On lower difficulties you can just spam warriors and win Plus, it's turn-based, so you have plenty of time to think about your turn.. not like playing SC2 where some gosu korean can do 300 actions per minute and beat you before you build your first SCV.
-----signature-----
Windwick
|
Link to this post
|
Zavitz
Title: You stink, and that's sad ]=
Posts:
19,709
Registered:
Apr 18, '04
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 11,196
User ID: 915,771
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Chickennugget101 posted: The game is very confusing.. but most of that stuff is just for when you want to move up in difficulty. On lower difficulties you can just spam warriors and win Plus, it's turn-based, so you have plenty of time to think about your turn.. not like playing SC2 where some gosu korean can do 300 actions per minute and beat you before you build your first SCV.
Adam if you want me to coach you just say so. Maybe I'll give it a try, 30 bucks on steam for Civ4 + expansions. Although honestly, on youtube the game makes 0 sense. Edit: Eh screw it, downloading it now and will give it a try tonight.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
Chickennugget101
Title: [face_peace] =+2
Posts:
12,598
Registered:
Feb 5, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 12,008
User ID: 767,206
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
http://www.youtube.com/user/GetDaved Watch that guy's Let's Play for Civ4. I learned a lot doing it.. but the games last forever(this guy can win in like 1-2 hours.. but I've spent 10+ hours on one game). And frankie, my micro/macro skills just wont get any better. They're good enough that I can own pretty hard with micro intensive heroes in HoN/dota.. but that's about it. When it comes to macroing a 4 expansion zerg base.. I'm just too white.
-----signature-----
Windwick
|
Link to this post
|
Zavitz
Title: You stink, and that's sad ]=
Posts:
19,709
Registered:
Apr 18, '04
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 11,196
User ID: 915,771
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Chickennugget101 posted: http://www.youtube.com/user/GetDaved Watch that guy's Let's Play for Civ4. I learned a lot doing it.. but the games last forever(this guy can win in like 1-2 hours.. but I've spent 10+ hours on one game). And frankie, my micro/macro skills just wont get any better. They're good enough that I can own pretty hard with micro intensive heroes in HoN/dota.. but that's about it. When it comes to macroing a 4 expansion zerg base.. I'm just too white.
That's why you play Terran (Easiest to macro in my opinion) or death-ball Brotoss. Even I can't handle the macro / micro of high zerg play.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
Zavitz
Title: You stink, and that's sad ]=
Posts:
19,709
Registered:
Apr 18, '04
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 11,196
User ID: 915,771
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
This game seriously makes no sense.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
Chickennugget101
Title: [face_peace] =+2
Posts:
12,598
Registered:
Feb 5, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 12,008
User ID: 767,206
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
http://www.civfanatics.com/civ4/strategy Read the intro articles, and refer back to it for specific questions you have.. Or ask, but best bet is to read some introductory stuff or you're gonna have like 3 trillion questions.
-----signature-----
Windwick
|
Link to this post
|
Zavitz
Title: You stink, and that's sad ]=
Posts:
19,709
Registered:
Apr 18, '04
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 11,196
User ID: 915,771
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
This crap better be worth it Adam, or I'm gonna find you and punch you in the balls.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
PallyDog
Title: WoW Vault Staff Teh Pyckles!
Posts:
13,429
Registered:
Mar 4, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 13,007
User ID: 776,236
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Zavitz, here's what you do to get started.
You have two units, a settler who can build a city and warrior or scout.
Send the warrior or scout out to find little villages and discover the map. When you find a little circle of huts you get gold, a map or a new unit.
Use your settler to build a city asap. That's yoru capital city, then make a unti to guard then start making workers to improve it.
Just pick what ever technology sounds cool at this point, like if you have a lot of cows near, pick animal husbandry or a lot of rice paddies, pick farming. Building cottages makes gold for you, so pick pottery. That kind of thing.
Don't try to win yet, just enjoy building your civilization. As you become familiar then you can start trading with other nations, destroy them or make goals for a type of victory, you can be voted king of the world, you can build the biggest population and cover the most area to win, you can slaughter all your enemies, you win a cultural victory by having a ton of culture in three cities, etc, etc.
Make cities, kill barbarians, build stuff. Cake.
-----signature-----
"Pallys are simply self healing rocks." - IndridCole
|
Link to this post
|
Zavitz
Title: You stink, and that's sad ]=
Posts:
19,709
Registered:
Apr 18, '04
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 11,196
User ID: 915,771
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Alright well, here's gonna be my opening strategy. I'm pretty much gonna play this game like Sim City and ignore the fact there is other factions. I have no idea why, but I'm completely in love with the main menu music.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
PallyDog
Title: WoW Vault Staff Teh Pyckles!
Posts:
13,429
Registered:
Mar 4, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 13,007
User ID: 776,236
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
I love the Civ music. And horay for Leonard Nemoy! I hate the new guy. ><
Can you like use Steam to play Civ IV with peeps you know? I don't know how steam works tbh.
-----signature-----
"Pallys are simply self healing rocks." - IndridCole
|
Link to this post
|
Zavitz
Title: You stink, and that's sad ]=
Posts:
19,709
Registered:
Apr 18, '04
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 11,196
User ID: 915,771
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Uh, I have no idea how it'd work with an older game. I know when I used to play L4D on Steam you could just invite people to play with you. Sorta like how Xbox live works. Edit: Holy crap now I get what you guys meant about building a wonder. I wanted to be a Russian to build the great pyramids! That stuff takes way too long to do off of only 2 cities.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
Zavitz
Title: You stink, and that's sad ]=
Posts:
19,709
Registered:
Apr 18, '04
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 11,196
User ID: 915,771
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Ok, so I guess the expansions work independently of each other?
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
Chickennugget101
Title: [face_peace] =+2
Posts:
12,598
Registered:
Feb 5, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 12,008
User ID: 767,206
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
I've used hamachi to play civ4 with other people.. it takes so long though And frankie, I'm usually a fan of peaceful strategies as well. You'll just want to do some good diplomacy as well. Share a religion with your neighbors is the easiest way.. Once you learn the leader's personalities, you'll realize which will/wont declare war, which ones will love if you if trade with them(tech whores(pacal,mansa etc), which ones just wont talk to you ever(just whores(shaka,toku, etc), and which ones only like you if you're their religion(religious whores(isabella etc). And just use beyond the sword xpac, the other clients are just if you want to play older versions.
-----signature-----
Windwick
|
Link to this post
|
Chickennugget101
Title: [face_peace] =+2
Posts:
12,598
Registered:
Feb 5, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 12,008
User ID: 767,206
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Oh, and the last link was completely wrong for the Let's Play. http://www.youtube.com/user/TheMelnTeam That's the right one.
-----signature-----
Windwick
|
Link to this post
|
Zavitz
Title: You stink, and that's sad ]=
Posts:
19,709
Registered:
Apr 18, '04
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 11,196
User ID: 915,771
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Chickennugget101 posted: I've used hamachi to play civ4 with other people.. it takes so long though And frankie, I'm usually a fan of peaceful strategies as well. You'll just want to do some good diplomacy as well. Share a religion with your neighbors is the easiest way.. Once you learn the leader's personalities, you'll realize which will/wont declare war, which ones will love if you if trade with them(tech whores(pacal,mansa etc), which ones just wont talk to you ever(just whores(shaka,toku, etc), and which ones only like you if you're their religion(religious whores(isabella etc). And just use beyond the sword xpac, the other clients are just if you want to play older versions.
Yea honestly the combat part of this game just seems so, slow? It holds my attention because the tech tree is FREAKING REDICULOUS. I was kind of hoping for a campaign type thing though.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
Chickennugget101
Title: [face_peace] =+2
Posts:
12,598
Registered:
Feb 5, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 12,008
User ID: 767,206
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
There are scenarios to play(and usually they're pretty cool). But yeah, just scout with your initial war/scout(try and scout out potential city sites and meet neighbors), and settle where you start(it's right 90% of the time, dont worry about the other 10% yet). Build a worker first, and tech the technology that allows your to improve the tiles near your new capitol. After the worker, build warriors till size 3-4, then switch to settler and get yourself a second city. You should have ~1.5 workers per city. Oh, and make sure to turn tile yields/resources on(it's a button above the minimap). It'll make it easier to see good city sites. This will be a good start for you. Also, download this mod: http://civ4bug.sourceforge.net/BUGMod.html It will make life SOOOO much easier. To plan cities inside the mod, i think the hotkey is ctrl+x.. or alt+x it's been a while.
-----signature-----
Windwick
|
Link to this post
|
Zavitz
Title: You stink, and that's sad ]=
Posts:
19,709
Registered:
Apr 18, '04
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 11,196
User ID: 915,771
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
For some reason, this game pushes me to play SC2 more.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
Chickennugget101
Title: [face_peace] =+2
Posts:
12,598
Registered:
Feb 5, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 12,008
User ID: 767,206
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
probably because your asian hands want to too move 300 apm and that's just silly in civ4
-----signature-----
Windwick
|
Link to this post
|
Zavitz
Title: You stink, and that's sad ]=
Posts:
19,709
Registered:
Apr 18, '04
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 11,196
User ID: 915,771
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
I actually only average 50-100, I don't do a million clicks to tell 1 unit to move to a spot. And I'm a pretty average player.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
Chickennugget101
Title: [face_peace] =+2
Posts:
12,598
Registered:
Feb 5, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 12,008
User ID: 767,206
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
hmmmm, i do 150apm+ in hon/dota with most heroes(sans junglers). i've never recorded my apm from SC/WC3 though
-----signature-----
Windwick
|
Link to this post
|
Zavitz
Title: You stink, and that's sad ]=
Posts:
19,709
Registered:
Apr 18, '04
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 11,196
User ID: 915,771
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Well Adam, apparently you have accepted "The Gift" better than me. I think I average 100-120 on HoN.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
Chickennugget101
Title: [face_peace] =+2
Posts:
12,598
Registered:
Feb 5, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 12,008
User ID: 767,206
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Well I think I watched too much competitive play.. and when last hitting I constantly move around instead of just holding position.
-----signature-----
Windwick
|
Link to this post
|
Daimar
Title: Moderator DAoC Knight - Generalist
Posts:
57,526
Registered:
Nov 5, '04
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 47,007
User ID: 987,256
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
found my Civ 4 discs and now I want to find Civ3, I enjoyed that one a lot more than 4.
-----signature-----
LGM Tailor x3, SC x3, AC x3, WC x3, Alch x3, Fletch http://gimpchimp.etilader.com/s.php?u=daimar babies cry a lot, but then they smile at you and you stop throwing them into the wall. - Goatstar
|
Link to this post
|
Zavitz
Title: You stink, and that's sad ]=
Posts:
19,709
Registered:
Apr 18, '04
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 11,196
User ID: 915,771
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Chickennugget101 posted: Well I think I watched too much competitive play.. and when last hitting I constantly move around instead of just holding position.
Well yea, that's way better. I think mine mainly drops once the laning phase is over, I don't really spam moving to one spot.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
Chickennugget101
Title: [face_peace] =+2
Posts:
12,598
Registered:
Feb 5, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 12,008
User ID: 767,206
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Daimar: I enjoyed Civ3 more too.. but I couldn't STAAAAAAND people coming behind my borders and making cities. It was so annoying. Thankfully they added a heavy negative weight for civs doing that in civ4. Frankie: I also like to maximize my dps by just a little bit(at least until you get enough attack speed) by move->attack->move->attack. it takes away your backswing. probably negligible but it's already habit at this point.
-----signature-----
Windwick
|
Link to this post
|
Zavitz
Title: You stink, and that's sad ]=
Posts:
19,709
Registered:
Apr 18, '04
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 11,196
User ID: 915,771
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
No the technique you're referring to is known as animation cancelling or orb walking. It's completely necessary early in the game when you're commonly chasing a person while trying to kill them, since they won't just turn around fight you. Otherwise it's still useable on some spells, but later on it's not required since you'll typically attack faster than is possible to come ahead by ani cancelling. Edit: On some heroes it is painful to not do it though, first hero that comes to mind is Sand Wraith for Hon. And pretty much any range hero.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
OSULugan
Title: Vanilla Ice Posse
Posts:
3,297
Registered:
Jul 4, '04
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 3,018
User ID: 941,398
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
This franchise has been on a downhill slide since Civ2, imho. And MoO peaked on the first iteration. MoO2, with no stacking of ships made combat too complicated, and then automation made MoO3 == Master of the Next Turn button.
-----signature-----
I roll 20s I'm kind of a big deal. People know me.
|
Link to this post
|
Chickennugget101
Title: [face_peace] =+2
Posts:
12,598
Registered:
Feb 5, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 12,008
User ID: 767,206
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Zavitz posted: No the technique you're referring to is known as animation cancelling or orb walking. It's completely necessary early in the game when you're commonly chasing a person while trying to kill them, since they won't just turn around fight you. Otherwise it's still useable on some spells, but later on it's not required since you'll typically attack faster than is possible to come ahead by ani cancelling. Edit: On some heroes it is painful to not do it though, first hero that comes to mind is Sand Wraith for Hon. And pretty much any range hero.
I know, I play way too much HoN :\ my roommate has a boner for the game, and makes me play it way too much. I probably should be in the 1800 bracket, but I'm stuck in the 1650s because I drink too much any play
-----signature-----
Windwick
|
Link to this post
|
Zavitz
Title: You stink, and that's sad ]=
Posts:
19,709
Registered:
Apr 18, '04
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 11,196
User ID: 915,771
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Chickennugget101 posted:
Zavitz posted: No the technique you're referring to is known as animation cancelling or orb walking. It's completely necessary early in the game when you're commonly chasing a person while trying to kill them, since they won't just turn around fight you. Otherwise it's still useable on some spells, but later on it's not required since you'll typically attack faster than is possible to come ahead by ani cancelling. Edit: On some heroes it is painful to not do it though, first hero that comes to mind is Sand Wraith for Hon. And pretty much any range hero.
I know, I play way too much HoN :\ my roommate has a boner for the game, and makes me play it way too much. I probably should be in the 1800 bracket, but I'm stuck in the 1650s because I drink too much any play
S2 makes some of the most retarded heroes ever so I haven't been playing.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
Chickennugget101
Title: [face_peace] =+2
Posts:
12,598
Registered:
Feb 5, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 12,008
User ID: 767,206
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
Zavitz posted:
Chickennugget101 posted:
Zavitz posted: No the technique you're referring to is known as animation cancelling or orb walking. It's completely necessary early in the game when you're commonly chasing a person while trying to kill them, since they won't just turn around fight you. Otherwise it's still useable on some spells, but later on it's not required since you'll typically attack faster than is possible to come ahead by ani cancelling. Edit: On some heroes it is painful to not do it though, first hero that comes to mind is Sand Wraith for Hon. And pretty much any range hero.
I know, I play way too much HoN :\ my roommate has a boner for the game, and makes me play it way too much. I probably should be in the 1800 bracket, but I'm stuck in the 1650s because I drink too much any play
S2 makes some of the most retarded heroes ever so I haven't been playing.
Lol I know. I'm 38-7 with cthuluphant hahahah. He's so fun!
-----signature-----
Windwick
|
Link to this post
|
Elkad
Title: aka Ebenezer
Posts:
8,058
Registered:
Sep 11, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 7,478
User ID: 837,586
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
I played Civ1, and then skipped all the way to Civ4 (darn MMO addiction inbetween). I did play MOO and MOO2, skipped MoO3. I still play MOO on occasion. I guess 4 started weak compared to 3, but the expansions fixed it right up. With the expansions, it's a great game. It's also pretty well balanced between civs at the higher difficulties (well, except Incas Quechua-rushing AIs on small maps). BUG and BetterAI mods make the standard game even better (BUG is interface enhancements, BetterAI improves AI play) Get them both as a package here
-----signature-----
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty, than those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson
|
Link to this post
|
Umlap
Title: the original d-oh-double-g
Posts:
32,256
Registered:
Apr 5, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 26,569
User ID: 787,813
|
Subject:
I think we need a Civ IV thread
|
I think we need a Civ IV ding
-----signature-----
cb umlap <+1folife> reporting for duty dogscratch um**p reab all moved elsewhere
|
Link to this post
|