|
|
|
|
[VN
Boards Archive] |
Welcome to the Vault Network
forum archive.
This is not a complete archive, time didn't allot us the
opportunity to properly backup the majority of the boards
deemed "expendable". Most boards on this list have at least
20-40 pages archived (non-logged in pages, 15 topics per
page).
Popular boards may have as many as 250 pages archived at 50
topics per page, while others deemed of historical
signifigance may be archived in their entirety.
We may not agree with how the board shutdown was managed, but
we've done what we could to preserve some of its history in
lieu of that.
Please enjoy the archive.
~
Managers, Moderators, VIP's, and regular posters.
|
Author |
Topic: Dragonwrath Questline Changes
|
Vault_News
Title: 0110011010 Be Nice to Me I'm a Bot
Posts:
43,785
Registered:
Oct 18, '05
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 42,467
User ID: 1,086,234
|
Subject:
Dragonwrath Questline Changes
|
Daxxarri posted:
That's another issue, though it has less to do with drop rates and more to do with how the quest can reasonably be completed. We came up with a "parallelization" concept where a player could be on phase 3 of making Dragonwrath, while another raider in the same group could be on phase 2. We thought that would feel better for the players involved, and it did, but more because they were getting their staves faster than for any other reason. The real problem with this idea is that it made it very difficult to balance the time investment it takes to create a staff. The first staff might take x amount of time to create, but then subsequent staves could potentially come out the door a lot faster.
Legendaries aren't very legendary if 20% of the raiding population is carrying them -- never mind the ripple effects that their presence can have on game balance in PvE and PvP. Ultimately, 'parallelization' made a too powerful item, too easy to get, too quickly. In short, it was a mistake that we regret, and one we won't be repeating in the future. It also left us with a situation that we needed to address, though, which is why we nerfed the quest item drop rates to begin with.
All of that is merely by way of explaining how we arrived at this point. The heart of the issue for many of you has been 10-player raid drop rates and I?d like to take a moment to thank those of you who provided clear, constructive feedback in these threads and elsewhere. It?s been really valuable during our deliberations and helped us arrive at a decision that we think will address our concerns and yours.
We?ve decided to revert the drop rate change for 10-player heroic Firelands completely. We?ll also be slightly buffing the drop rates in 10-player normal. In the end, we should get the following results:
- 25-player heroic has 44% lower drop rates in phase 3 relative to 4.2 launch.
- 25-player normal remains unchanged from 4.2 launch.
- 10-player heroic remains unchanged from 4.2 launch.
- 10-player normal has 33% higher drop rates in phase 3 relative to 4.2 launch.
We plan to hotfix the new rates into place as soon as possible, and we should see them in-place pre-raid this evening barring unforeseen complications.
Posted from WoW Vault
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
|
|
© 2012. All
Rights Reserved. |
|
|
|
|