|
|
|
|
[VN
Boards Archive] |
Welcome to the Vault Network
forum archive.
This is not a complete archive, time didn't allot us the
opportunity to properly backup the majority of the boards
deemed "expendable". Most boards on this list have at least
20-40 pages archived (non-logged in pages, 15 topics per
page).
Popular boards may have as many as 250 pages archived at 50
topics per page, while others deemed of historical
signifigance may be archived in their entirety.
We may not agree with how the board shutdown was managed, but
we've done what we could to preserve some of its history in
lieu of that.
Please enjoy the archive.
~
Managers, Moderators, VIP's, and regular posters.
|
Author |
Topic: Tol Barad Balance
|
Vault_News
Title: 0110011010 Be Nice to Me I'm a Bot
Posts:
43,785
Registered:
Oct 18, '05
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 42,467
User ID: 1,086,234
|
Subject:
Tol Barad Balance
|
Mumper posted:
Now that Cataclysm is out in the wild, more players are getting gearing up and checking out Tol Barad, the new outdoor PvP zone. Today, we wanted to address some of the concerns players have expressed about the zone, including how challenging it can be to win as the attacking team, and provide some insight into our design approach. We also wanted to share some of the lessons we learned from Wintergrasp, discuss the difference between the two zones, and touch upon the recent hotfixes made to Honor Point gains and how we plan to improve Tol Barad going forward. We're confident this zone will provide meaningful and fun PvP for some time to come, but we also recognize additional tuning is required to ensure Tol Barad is everything we intend it to be.
As we mentioned earlier, the attacking faction is having a pretty tough time winning control of Tol Barad -- and we're OK with that, at least in theory. Here's why: When we set out to create Wintergrasp, one of the issues we dealt with was that we were never able to ensure the sides were even -- in fact, they rarely were. Because the smaller team would almost always be assured defeat, we attempted to address team-size imbalance by favoring the attacker. Control of Wintergrasp went back and forth, and the result was that battles lost their impact. On most realms the defenders became complacent, knowing they were likely to lose control of the zone, returning to re-take it when it was their turn to attack. The sides swapped back and forth every few hours, and Wintergrasp wasn?t so much about an epic struggle for a meaningful piece of land as it was a complicated game of leapfrog.
Since then we?ve devised mechanics that help ensure equal team sizes, and we've taken Wintergrasp's lessons to heart when we designed Tol Barad. Tol Barad is intentionally balanced so that it?s a challenge for the attackers, because we want to make sure that control of Tol Barad matters. For the defenders, there?s a sense of urgency that Wintergrasp didn't have -- if you lose it, you?re going to have a hell of a time taking it back. For the attackers, there are a number of rewards at stake -- such as access to the Baradin Hold raid and additional daily quests -- that we hope players feel are worth fighting for. That sort of tension is what we wanted from Wintergrasp, and what we believe Tol Barad can ultimately offer.
With that being said, we want winning Tol Barad to be a challenge for the attacking faction... but we don't want it to be impossible. Taking Tol Barad should be tough -- but right now it?s a little bit too tough, and it?s something we?re actively working to balance. Earlier, we attempted to temporarily address the issue by offering a far better reward to the winning attackers: Honor Points awarded for successfully attacking were increased tenfold, but that was such a great incentive that it ultimately undermined the spirit of competition. Since then, the reward for winning as an attacker has been brought back down to a more reasonable amount.
While we've already made minor adjustments to improve the gameplay and address select exploits, our job in Tol Barad is far from over. We ultimately want to make sure that any changes we make are all steps in the right direction, and we intend to make several updates in the next minor patch to address design and balance issues affecting attackers that we can't address with hotfixes. For example, we plan to alter the battle slightly so that a team with two bases captured can more quickly and easily capture the third, as opposed to a team with one or zero bases. This way, if the defenders turtle up, it'll be a little easier for the attackers to take their last base before the defense can take one of the attackers' other bases.
We've been reading your feedback, watching trends across our global realms, and fighting plenty of battles in Tol Barad ourselves to get a feel for what's working and what isn't, and we're committed to making Tol Barad a fun and engaging zone. We want owning the zone to be meaningful throughout the lifespan of the expansion -- and while the attackers may always face somewhat of an uphill battle, the defenders should feel much more pressure not to lose than they do currently. Just the same, the attacking faction should feel motivated to take Tol Barad back, but they shouldn't feel that the odds are insurmountable. So keep fighting the good fight, and we'll continue watching the battlefield and listening to your feedback.
Cory "Mumper" Stockton is the lead content designer on World of Warcraft and enjoys a good set of LEGOs.
Posted from WoW Vault
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
Rill_of_WE
Title: WoW Vault Site Manager
Posts:
6,074
Registered:
Aug 6, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 6,001
User ID: 703,880
|
Subject:
Tol Barad Balance
|
For example, we plan to alter the battle slightly so that a team with two bases captured can more quickly and easily capture the third, as opposed to a team with one or zero bases. This way, if the defenders turtle up, it'll be a little easier for the attackers to take their last base before the defense can take one of the attackers' other bases. This has promise.
-----signature-----
|
Link to this post
|
Broken_Kayfabe
Posts:
9,125
Registered:
Feb 16, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 9,010
User ID: 646,295
|
Subject:
Tol Barad Balance
|
tl,dr version: "We have no idea what the fark we are doing, but eventually one of our randomly selected solutions will accidentally work."
-----signature-----
Thanks, but it's been fun Five more minutes then I'm done! I've been saying that to myself since ...yesterday. - from "Has anybody seen my corpse". Man Everquest rocked back in the day...
|
Link to this post
|
Elaok
Title: I has title now!
Posts:
9,497
Registered:
Sep 10, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 9,208
User ID: 837,259
|
Subject:
Tol Barad Balance
|
it felt like a lawyer typed that up what the hell Blizzard
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
Ugh_Lancelot
Title: Ooo...bouncy!
Posts:
5,492
Registered:
Jun 17, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 5,446
User ID: 689,383
|
Subject:
Tol Barad Balance
|
Blizzard posted: For the attackers, there are a number of rewards at stake -- such as access to the Baradin Hold raid and additional daily quests -- that we hope players feel are worth fighting for.
Heh...yeah, I see in /2 all the time where folks are just chomping at the bit to go run that raid and those dailies. /straightface
-----signature-----
WoW and DAoC - Too many alts to count Charter Member - Altaholics Anonymous
|
Link to this post
|
Sociop
Posts:
402
Registered:
Dec 8, '09
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 402
User ID: 1,378,656
|
Subject:
Tol Barad Balance
|
Rill_of_WE posted:
For example, we plan to alter the battle slightly so that a team with two bases captured can more quickly and easily capture the third, as opposed to a team with one or zero bases. This way, if the defenders turtle up, it'll be a little easier for the attackers to take their last base before the defense can take one of the attackers' other bases.
This has promise.
Won't work, the defense already roams from capped base to capped base in one big pack so that it is rare to have two and when you do its is only for couple minutes at the most. This has been the whole problem all along, there is no reason for the defense to spread out and there is no way for an offense that is forced to spread out to hold any flag against an entire incoming defense.
The whole design is a flawed failure which they must have invested a nanosecond of foresight into.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
Kriegprojekt
Posts:
2,653
Registered:
Apr 12, '10
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 2,591
User ID: 1,390,814
|
Subject:
Tol Barad Balance
|
Nice. They didnt really say anything in that message.
-----signature-----
http://www.immortal-guild.com/ Deepstrike Server Milkman - Guardian Bard
|
Link to this post
|
|
|
© 2012. All
Rights Reserved. |
|
|
|
|