Author Topic: Target Info oddness
_Rascal_ 
Posts: ????
Registered: ????
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 0
User ID: 0
Subject: Target Info oddness
Target info 3.1.0.0a is recommending lightning against acidic diamond golems, but COD says they have high resistance to lightning
and recommends bludge and pierce.

 

-----signature-----
Link to this post
Bowdiddly 
Posts: ????
Registered: ????
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 0
User ID: 0
Subject: Target Info oddness
I had Target info crap out on me last night, kept giving an error about something allready assigned????

 

-----signature-----
Link to this post
Geezer_Ed 
Posts: ????
Registered: ????
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 0
User ID: 0
Subject: Target Info oddness
Hey Bow, check this thread out.

http://vnboards.ign.com/ac_utilities/b5432/93872731/p1/?13


 

-----signature-----
Link to this post
Digero 
Posts: 7,435
Registered: Oct 21, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 7,359
User ID: 729,875
Subject: Target Info oddness
http://ac.warcry.com/compendium/creature/index.php?action=display&id=528

Warcry says they have "Low" resistance to lightning, which is better than the "Below Average" resistance they have to bludge and pierce. Target Info's data matches what that page says (and it should, considering that's were target info gets its data tongue ).

 

-----signature-----
[LotRO] Digero (Guardian), Digrim (Burglar), Dignite (LM), Azrea (Hunter) - Landroval
[AC] Digero, Lyera, Draxxe - Leafcull (Retired)
[CoH] Devil's Zealot, Scinta, Izzard - Guardian (Retired)
Digero's AC Decal Plugins: http://decal.acasylum.com
Link to this post
_Rascal_ 
Posts: ????
Registered: ????
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 0
User ID: 0
Subject: Target Info oddness
I must be loosing my mind hypnotized I coulda sworn it said high for lightning.
I do 400-500+ dmg with bludge vs 100-150 with lightning. I submitted a bug report to CoD.

 

-----signature-----
Link to this post

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Powered by PHP