Sith_Mauler
Posts:
24,642
Registered:
Dec 21, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 24,438
User ID: 750,977
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
PHOENIX (AP) — Women in Arizona trying to get reimbursed for birth control drugs through their employer-provided health plan could be required to prove that they are taking it for a medical reason such as acne, rather than to prevent pregnancy. A bill nearing passage in the Republican-led Legislature allows all employers, not just religious institutions, to opt out of providing contraceptive coverage when doing so would violate their religious or moral beliefs. When a female worker uses birth control pills, which can be used to treat a number of medical conditions, the bill would allow an employer who opted out to require her to reveal what she was taking it for in order to get reimbursed. The bill thrusts the state into a raging national debate about religious freedom and birth control, sparked after the Obama administration required that employers must provide contraception coverage under the federal health care overhaul. http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iAiWecJ_Stkfdleer6RzuTNjtbuQ?docId=85281c12012a44e0b9ce37b15e5ce302
-----signature-----
Well I ain't first class But I ain't white trash I'm wild and a little crazy too I have seen a lot of things in my life time. That is why I walk the line I walk.
|
Link to this post
|
Darwynnia
Title: Sugar Kibbi
Posts:
38,553
Registered:
Oct 13, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 36,556
User ID: 845,204
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
Sith_Mauler posted: PHOENIX (AP) — Women in Arizona trying to get reimbursed for birth control drugs through their employer-provided health plan could be required to prove that they are taking it for a medical reason such as acne, rather than to prevent pregnancy. A bill nearing passage in the Republican-led Legislature allows all employers, not just religious institutions, to opt out of providing contraceptive coverage when doing so would violate their religious or moral beliefs. When a female worker uses birth control pills, which can be used to treat a number of medical conditions, the bill would allow an employer who opted out to require her to reveal what she was taking it for in order to get reimbursed. The bill thrusts the state into a raging national debate about religious freedom and birth control, sparked after the Obama administration required that employers must provide contraception coverage under the federal health care overhaul. http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iAiWecJ_Stkfdleer6RzuTNjtbuQ?docId=85281c12012a44e0b9ce37b15e5ce302
Absolutely ridiculous. That's an invasion of people's privacy - your employer has no right to force you to disclose why you are taking a legally prescribed medication.
-----signature-----
Cluttered Desks and Ideas... Sisters Forever Susan Lynne Hall 1/20/69-12/21/05 Rest in Peace
|
Link to this post
|
Jesus.Christ..
Posts:
212
Registered:
May 20, '11
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 212
User ID: 1,420,294
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
Will they be allowing employers to opt out of providing viagra to unmarried people, for the same reasons?
-----signature-----
Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned: forgive, and ye shall be forgiven.
|
Link to this post
|
Darwynnia
Title: Sugar Kibbi
Posts:
38,553
Registered:
Oct 13, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 36,556
User ID: 845,204
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
Jesus.Christ.. posted: Will they be allowing employers to opt out of providing viagra to all men, for the same reasons?
Fixed.
-----signature-----
Cluttered Desks and Ideas... Sisters Forever Susan Lynne Hall 1/20/69-12/21/05 Rest in Peace
|
Link to this post
|
JD_HOGG
Posts:
19,975
Registered:
Mar 18, '08
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 19,893
User ID: 1,285,011
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
Darwynnia posted:
Sith_Mauler posted: PHOENIX (AP) — Women in Arizona trying to get reimbursed for birth control drugs through their employer-provided health plan could be required to prove that they are taking it for a medical reason such as acne, rather than to prevent pregnancy. A bill nearing passage in the Republican-led Legislature allows all employers, not just religious institutions, to opt out of providing contraceptive coverage when doing so would violate their religious or moral beliefs. When a female worker uses birth control pills, which can be used to treat a number of medical conditions, the bill would allow an employer who opted out to require her to reveal what she was taking it for in order to get reimbursed. The bill thrusts the state into a raging national debate about religious freedom and birth control, sparked after the Obama administration required that employers must provide contraception coverage under the federal health care overhaul. http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iAiWecJ_Stkfdleer6RzuTNjtbuQ?docId=85281c12012a44e0b9ce37b15e5ce302
Absolutely ridiculous. That's an invasion of people's privacy - your employer has no right to force you to disclose why you are taking a legally prescribed medication.
I KNOW ITS INVASION OF PRIVACY BECAUSE NO WAY THEY COULD POSSIBLY JUST BUY INSURANCE POLICIES THAT DO NOT COVER IT! THE ONLY WAY THIS IS POSSIBLE IS FOR YOUR NOSEY BOSS TO SNOOP IN YOUR MEDICAL RECORD!!!
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
Rhodoman
Posts:
81,876
Registered:
Jun 14, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 80,454
User ID: 154,069
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
Just more reasons why employers shouldn't be involved with health care or coverage. Rho
-----signature-----
Rho is correct. - Varece Venit hiems quidquid Latine dictum sit altum viditur Referring to illegal aliens as 'immigrants' is the same as referring to shoplifters as 'shoppers' - Dorvinion
|
Link to this post
|
combat_mage_sc
Title: Hi. My name is Combat and i'm an alcoholic.
Posts:
41,508
Registered:
Jul 20, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 40,845
User ID: 266,617
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
Since bitchies get free birth control can men get free dick enlargements?
-----signature-----
.................._@@@__ ......_____//____?___\________ - ---o--------BEER-POLICE----@) -----`--(@)======+====(@)--
|
Link to this post
|
Dark_EternalFF
Title: Official ACF Turd
Posts:
85,900
Registered:
Nov 8, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 84,100
User ID: 736,311
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
Rhodoman posted: Just more reasons why employers shouldn't be involved with health care or coverage. Rho
Quiet, you. I like my cadillac plan.
-----signature-----
Max Fox (AC), Zygran (WoW, SWTOR) "We poison our air and water to weed out the weak! We set off fission bombs in our only biosphere! We nailed our God to a stick! Don't fk with the human race!" DE/Mr Pants 2012
|
Link to this post
|
Rhodoman
Posts:
81,876
Registered:
Jun 14, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 80,454
User ID: 154,069
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
Dark_EternalFF posted:
Rhodoman posted: Just more reasons why employers shouldn't be involved with health care or coverage. Rho
Quiet, you. I like my cadillac plan.
And you're paying for it with a lower-than-market-rate pay wage. Your company is wasting money administering that plan for you and the rest of the employees. Better to just pay you what you're worth and let you buy the plan you want. Rho
-----signature-----
Rho is correct. - Varece Venit hiems quidquid Latine dictum sit altum viditur Referring to illegal aliens as 'immigrants' is the same as referring to shoplifters as 'shoppers' - Dorvinion
|
Link to this post
|
JD_HOGG
Posts:
19,975
Registered:
Mar 18, '08
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 19,893
User ID: 1,285,011
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
Rhodoman posted:
Dark_EternalFF posted:
Rhodoman posted: Just more reasons why employers shouldn't be involved with health care or coverage. Rho
Quiet, you. I like my cadillac plan.
And you're paying for it with a lower-than-market-rate pay wage. Your company is wasting money administering that plan for you and the rest of the employees. Better to just pay you what you're worth and let you buy the plan you want. Rho
He'd have to pay far more for an individual Cadillac plan than a group would pay.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
combat_mage_sc
Title: Hi. My name is Combat and i'm an alcoholic.
Posts:
41,508
Registered:
Jul 20, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 40,845
User ID: 266,617
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
I got a Pinto plan
-----signature-----
.................._@@@__ ......_____//____?___\________ - ---o--------BEER-POLICE----@) -----`--(@)======+====(@)--
|
Link to this post
|
Rhodoman
Posts:
81,876
Registered:
Jun 14, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 80,454
User ID: 154,069
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
JD_HOGG posted:
Rhodoman posted:
Dark_EternalFF posted: Quiet, you. I like my cadillac plan.
And you're paying for it with a lower-than-market-rate pay wage. Your company is wasting money administering that plan for you and the rest of the employees. Better to just pay you what you're worth and let you buy the plan you want. Rho
He'd have to pay far more for an individual Cadillac plan than a group would pay.
Not if everyone were shopping for themselves after companyies stopped having to buy them for their employees. Getting an individual plan now *IS* more expensive but that's because the whole industry has been screwed up by the government. Rho
-----signature-----
Rho is correct. - Varece Venit hiems quidquid Latine dictum sit altum viditur Referring to illegal aliens as 'immigrants' is the same as referring to shoplifters as 'shoppers' - Dorvinion
|
Link to this post
|
_Gimpzilla_
Posts:
20,415
Registered:
Mar 12, '00
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 16,767
User ID: 14,675
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
Rhodoman posted:
JD_HOGG posted:
Rhodoman posted: [quote=Dark_EternalFF]Quiet, you. I like my cadillac plan.
And you're paying for it with a lower-than-market-rate pay wage. Your company is wasting money administering that plan for you and the rest of the employees. Better to just pay you what you're worth and let you buy the plan you want.
Rho
He'd have to pay far more for an individual Cadillac plan than a group would pay.
Not if everyone were shopping for themselves after companyies stopped having to buy them for their employees. Getting an individual plan now *IS* more expensive but that's because the whole industry has been screwed up by the government.
Rho[/quote]
Hardly. As an individual, you have almost zero negotiating leverage.
-----signature-----
Cause you're not quite evil enough. You're semi-evil, you're quasi-evil, you're the margarine of evil,
you're the diet coke of evil, just one calorie, not "evil" enough.
Destroying small towns near you...
|
Link to this post
|
Rhodoman
Posts:
81,876
Registered:
Jun 14, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 80,454
User ID: 154,069
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
Your leverage would be to shop around to find the least expensive plan, just like it is with any other good or service you buy. The game is so rigged right now it's hard to even imagine it being efficient and cost-effective. Rho
-----signature-----
Rho is correct. - Varece Venit hiems quidquid Latine dictum sit altum viditur Referring to illegal aliens as 'immigrants' is the same as referring to shoplifters as 'shoppers' - Dorvinion
|
Link to this post
|
Anebriated
Title: I should be reading a book
Posts:
37,996
Registered:
Jan 27, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 36,373
User ID: 764,038
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
yeah, if the plan you want that covers your medications is too expensive, find a cheaper one that probably doesn't. are yo noticing how much leverage you have yet? it's like buying apples at the grocery store. exactly like apples.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
combat_mage_sc
Title: Hi. My name is Combat and i'm an alcoholic.
Posts:
41,508
Registered:
Jul 20, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 40,845
User ID: 266,617
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
Gubment meddling funks everything up.
-----signature-----
.................._@@@__ ......_____//____?___\________ - ---o--------BEER-POLICE----@) -----`--(@)======+====(@)--
|
Link to this post
|
NonOffensiveName
Title: Touching people in special places all day long
Posts:
27,882
Registered:
Oct 7, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 27,531
User ID: 444,059
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
ugh dang skanks wanting to get paid to have sex =\ I thought guys were supposed to be the horn dogs, cant those women keep it in their pants too?
-----signature-----
Q: What's an AW? A: A whore that likes attention
|
Link to this post
|
Sgian_Dubh
Posts:
10,339
Registered:
Apr 7, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 10,142
User ID: 788,270
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
Rhodoman posted: Your leverage would be to shop around to find the least expensive plan, just like it is with any other good or service you buy. The game is so rigged right now it's hard to even imagine it being efficient and cost-effective. Rho
It's harder to imagine that people actually believe any company would take whatever savings they'd get by not administering health insurance coverage and spending that on higher wages.
-----signature-----
"You'll rue the day you crossed me Trebek!"
|
Link to this post
|
JD_HOGG
Posts:
19,975
Registered:
Mar 18, '08
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 19,893
User ID: 1,285,011
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
Sgian_Dubh posted:
Rhodoman posted: Your leverage would be to shop around to find the least expensive plan, just like it is with any other good or service you buy. The game is so rigged right now it's hard to even imagine it being efficient and cost-effective. Rho
It's harder to imagine that people actually believe any company would take whatever savings they'd get by not administering health insurance coverage and spending that on higher wages.
Or the smart employers offering to continue paying for health insurance so employees don't have to hassle with it, thus retaining them.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
Rhodoman
Posts:
81,876
Registered:
Jun 14, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 80,454
User ID: 154,069
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
Once the companies are freed from the mandated administration of health coverage, they would begin to compete for employees from a different cost basis. If an employer didn't include health coverage as a benefit or pay you extra wages to pay for your own, you'd go work for someone else. Mostly, this frees both employers and employees to find the fairest price and choice for everyone. Making companies do things almost never works. The costs of the mandates get built in to the system. They're so far built in now that most folks can't even imagine the way jobs and wages would work without them. Rho
-----signature-----
Rho is correct. - Varece Venit hiems quidquid Latine dictum sit altum viditur Referring to illegal aliens as 'immigrants' is the same as referring to shoplifters as 'shoppers' - Dorvinion
|
Link to this post
|
_sooz_
Posts:
15,882
Registered:
Dec 4, '04
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 15,699
User ID: 1,001,625
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
NonOffensiveName posted: ugh dang skanks wanting to get paid to have sex =\ I thought guys were supposed to be the horn dogs, cant those women keep it in their pants too?
PLEASE tell me you're just trolling and dont actually think that...
-----signature-----
|
Link to this post
|
TickyAtack
Posts:
38,149
Registered:
Oct 23, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 37,528
User ID: 477,960
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
Whatever, there is gonna be a whole new slough of doctors just writing a note that says "for acne *wink* *wink"
-----signature-----
i, ticky.
|
Link to this post
|
Sgian_Dubh
Posts:
10,339
Registered:
Apr 7, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 10,142
User ID: 788,270
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
Rhodoman posted: Once the companies are freed from the mandated administration of health coverage, they would begin to compete for employees from a different cost basis. If an employer didn't include health coverage as a benefit or pay you extra wages to pay for your own, you'd go work for someone else. Mostly, this frees both employers and employees to find the fairest price and choice for everyone. Making companies do things almost never works. The costs of the mandates get built in to the system. They're so far built in now that most folks can't even imagine the way jobs and wages would work without them. Rho
That's quite the fantasyland you live in.
-----signature-----
"You'll rue the day you crossed me Trebek!"
|
Link to this post
|
NonOffensiveName
Title: Touching people in special places all day long
Posts:
27,882
Registered:
Oct 7, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 27,531
User ID: 444,059
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
_sooz_ posted: NonOffensiveName posted: ugh dang skanks wanting to get paid to have sex =\ I thought guys were supposed to be the horn dogs, cant those women keep it in their pants too?
PLEASE tell me you're just trolling and dont actually think that...
yeah yeah I know I know birth control is used to fight a few rare diseases as well....its like when a guy says he reads playboy only for the articles, yeah we really know what you're doing.
-----signature-----
Q: What's an AW? A: A whore that likes attention
|
Link to this post
|
Rhodoman
Posts:
81,876
Registered:
Jun 14, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 80,454
User ID: 154,069
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
Sgian_Dubh posted:
Rhodoman posted: Once the companies are freed from the mandated administration of health coverage, they would begin to compete for employees from a different cost basis. If an employer didn't include health coverage as a benefit or pay you extra wages to pay for your own, you'd go work for someone else. Mostly, this frees both employers and employees to find the fairest price and choice for everyone. Making companies do things almost never works. The costs of the mandates get built in to the system. They're so far built in now that most folks can't even imagine the way jobs and wages would work without them. Rho
That's quite the fantasyland you live in.
I'll just lump you in with the "most folks" mentioned above, then. Rho
-----signature-----
Rho is correct. - Varece Venit hiems quidquid Latine dictum sit altum viditur Referring to illegal aliens as 'immigrants' is the same as referring to shoplifters as 'shoppers' - Dorvinion
|
Link to this post
|
_sooz_
Posts:
15,882
Registered:
Dec 4, '04
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 15,699
User ID: 1,001,625
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
NonOffensiveName posted:
_sooz_ posted: NonOffensiveName posted: ugh dang skanks wanting to get paid to have sex =\ I thought guys were supposed to be the horn dogs, cant those women keep it in their pants too?
PLEASE tell me you're just trolling and dont actually think that...
yeah yeah I know I know birth control is used to fight a few rare diseases as well....its like when a guy says he reads playboy only for the articles, yeah we really know what you're doing.
No, i wasnt going to say that (plus acne, PMDD, PCOS etc arent rare, but whatever). What i was referring to was the "getting paid to have sex" comment. Im wondering if you really are that stupid, or if you're just acting.
-----signature-----
|
Link to this post
|
Ah-Schoo
Title: Fuzzy Caterpillar of Friendliness
Posts:
71,317
Registered:
Aug 11, '00
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 68,974
User ID: 39,247
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
JD_HOGG posted:
Rhodoman posted:
Dark_EternalFF posted: [quote=Rhodoman]Just more reasons why employers shouldn't be involved with health care or coverage. Rho
Quiet, you. I like my cadillac plan.
And you're paying for it with a lower-than-market-rate pay wage. Your company is wasting money administering that plan for you and the rest of the employees. Better to just pay you what you're worth and let you buy the plan you want. Rho
He'd have to pay far more for an individual Cadillac plan than a group would pay. [/quote] Plus he just stated he has the plan he wants. LOL
-----signature-----
. Opinion = fact. Anecdote = proof. Political label more important than either of those. Welcome to ACF, where debate goes to die. . "fascist totalitarian secular progressive Zionist intellectually challenged Christian puppets." - Aerlinthina
|
Link to this post
|
Jezza_Belle
Title: =^.^=
Posts:
62,779
Registered:
Feb 24, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 61,759
User ID: 70,100
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
TickyAtack posted: Whatever, there is gonna be a whole new slough of doctors just writing a note that says "for acne *wink* *wink"
suddenly the dermatology clinic is flooded with acne patients.
-----signature-----
( - Y - ) These ones are not real, just FYI. Follow my progress... http://tweetlbug.deviantart.com/
|
Link to this post
|
Jezza_Belle
Title: =^.^=
Posts:
62,779
Registered:
Feb 24, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 61,759
User ID: 70,100
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
and how would the non-breeder feel if that bill also cut off AIDS/HIV treatments to all people who can't prove they got it through no fault of their own? Everyone pretty much gets it from illicit drug use and sex these days, unless it's passed down from mother to child.
-----signature-----
( - Y - ) These ones are not real, just FYI. Follow my progress... http://tweetlbug.deviantart.com/
|
Link to this post
|
Aerlinthian
Posts:
66,222
Registered:
May 7, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 65,491
User ID: 94,919
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
I rather like that so much insanity is coming into being because of government. It will be by the hand of government of its own undoing, I eagerly look forward to that end.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|
NonOffensiveName
Title: Touching people in special places all day long
Posts:
27,882
Registered:
Oct 7, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 27,531
User ID: 444,059
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
Jezza_Belle posted: and how would the non-breeder feel if that bill also cut off AIDS/HIV treatments to all people who can't prove they got it through no fault of their own? Everyone pretty much gets it from illicit drug use and sex these days, unless it's passed down from mother to child.
weeee apples and oranges again...are you really comparing AIDS to getting pregnant? with the way you pro abortionists think about new babies in the womb on second thought you might think they are relatively the same thing
-----signature-----
Q: What's an AW? A: A whore that likes attention
|
Link to this post
|
_sooz_
Posts:
15,882
Registered:
Dec 4, '04
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 15,699
User ID: 1,001,625
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
NonOffensiveName posted:
Jezza_Belle posted: and how would the non-breeder feel if that bill also cut off AIDS/HIV treatments to all people who can't prove they got it through no fault of their own? Everyone pretty much gets it from illicit drug use and sex these days, unless it's passed down from mother to child.
weeee apples and oranges again...are you really comparing AIDS to getting pregnant? with the way you pro abortionists think about new babies in the womb on second thought you might think they are relatively the same thing
Birth control helps prevent pregnancies, thus meaning women dont need to get the abortions you find so abhorrent. So you're for birth control being made harder to get, thus INCREASING the number of unplanned pregnancies, thus leading to more abortion. Yeah, you're a special kind of stupid. And to work off Jezza's point, what if suddenly the government made it harder to get condoms? How would you feel then?
-----signature-----
|
Link to this post
|
Jezza_Belle
Title: =^.^=
Posts:
62,779
Registered:
Feb 24, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 61,759
User ID: 70,100
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
NonOffensiveName posted:
Jezza_Belle posted: and how would the non-breeder feel if that bill also cut off AIDS/HIV treatments to all people who can't prove they got it through no fault of their own? Everyone pretty much gets it from illicit drug use and sex these days, unless it's passed down from mother to child.
weeee apples and oranges again...are you really comparing AIDS to getting pregnant? with the way you pro abortionists think about new babies in the womb on second thought you might think they are relatively the same thing
We're talking about denying coverage to medicine, YOU are the one that is constantly talking about how the skanks should close their legs.... well the gays should stop bending over, and the druggies need to stop shooting up. Why should those that don't condone your way of life have to pay to keep you well? it's the SAME argument, and you're the only one that can't see it.
-----signature-----
( - Y - ) These ones are not real, just FYI. Follow my progress... http://tweetlbug.deviantart.com/
|
Link to this post
|
Kanga_Roo
Posts:
27,681
Registered:
Feb 26, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 27,388
User ID: 650,647
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
Dear Arizona, I suppose gay marriage is out of the question?
-----signature-----
Laws control the lesser man... Right conduct controls the greater one. Mark Twain
|
Link to this post
|
hart_thorin
Posts:
3,477
Registered:
Mar 25, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 3,406
User ID: 782,948
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
it depends on how the bill is written. if all they have to do is provide birth control, then all they have to do is issue condoms out to every worker, unless the bill states it is the workers choice on what kind of birth control they want.
-----signature-----
Hart Thorin 126 tank sword
people sleep peaceably in thier beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on thier behalf-George Orwell
Proud follower of the n00b Big Wiz
|
Link to this post
|
LadyMetropolis
Posts:
1,268
Registered:
Dec 23, '10
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 1,268
User ID: 1,409,972
|
Subject:
Ariz. bill could require another reason for birth control coverage besides birth control
|
hart_thorin posted: it depends on how the bill is written. if all they have to do is provide birth control, then all they have to do is issue condoms out to every worker, unless the bill states it is the workers choice on what kind of birth control they want.
Do we seriously need a bill for any of this? Really?
-----signature-----
(none)
|
Link to this post
|