Scarne
Title: Capo di Scientifico
Posts:
27,710
Registered:
Jul 23, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 22,798
User ID: 272,061
|
Subject:
If they could only use submarines and nothing else, who would win a war: China or USA ?
|
Unless the US went nuclear, it would likely be a pretty boring draw. 
-----signature-----
E Pluribus Unum
|
|
Link to this post
|
__Bonk__
Posts:
53,947
Registered:
Jul 25, '09
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 53,339
User ID: 1,364,654
|
Subject:
If they could only use submarines and nothing else, who would win a war: China or USA ?
|
Everyone loses in a nuclear war. I really do believe it could be enough to tip the world into another period of glaciation
-----signature-----
I keep my eyes fixed on the sun!
A change in feeling is a change in destiny.
|
|
Link to this post
|
sweeny_comodore
Posts:
9,066
Registered:
Aug 23, '07
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 8,113
User ID: 1,248,480
|
Subject:
If they could only use submarines and nothing else, who would win a war: China or USA ?
|
__Bonk__ posted:
Everyone loses in a nuclear war. I really do believe it could be enough to tip the world into another period of glaciation
i think whatever is causing our warming trend would fend off the glaciers for the most part
it worked in the 1800s
-----signature-----
Jesus? No, but there is indeed a god shaped hole in the heart of man, why is yours so empty? -- snarf igraine the original monotheism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phallus
|
|
Link to this post
|
BubbleDude
Title: Perma-N00b
Posts:
16,792
Registered:
Feb 27, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 14,490
User ID: 774,875
|
Subject:
If they could only use submarines and nothing else, who would win a war: China or USA ?
|
There was a nuclear war in the 1800's?
-----signature-----
"It's much easier to just bitch on the internet than actually do something." - Altra_Shadowstalker
It probably came here in the first place because it did a search for "pedo forum." - Yukishiro
|
|
Link to this post
|
Eager_Igraine
Posts:
20,126
Registered:
Nov 21, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 19,548
User ID: 740,268
|
Subject:
If they could only use submarines and nothing else, who would win a war: China or USA ?
|
|
China has submarines? Are they the new models with the screen doors?
-----signature-----
I radiate more heat than light.
I know what you're trying to do but you're just sailing another failboat over the falls. - imaloon1
|
|
Link to this post
|
Scarne
Title: Capo di Scientifico
Posts:
27,710
Registered:
Jul 23, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 22,798
User ID: 272,061
|
Subject:
If they could only use submarines and nothing else, who would win a war: China or USA ?
|
Eager_Igraine posted:
China has submarines?
Of course they do; it is the main focus of their naval buildup. They are the real ways to control the seas these days, and they aren't currently up to the task of competing in the aircraft carrier department verses the US. The main purpose of battleships and carriers these days is for attacking ground targets, not attacking other naval assets.
-----signature-----
E Pluribus Unum
|
|
Link to this post
|
eodoll
Posts:
17,153
Registered:
Feb 14, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 15,943
User ID: 645,592
|
Subject:
If they could only use submarines and nothing else, who would win a war: China or USA ?
|
|
If their subs are anything like their fighter jets (fake - show footage from top gun movie) or their aircraft carriers (bought from 50 yr old russian navy scraps) then their submarines would be hopeless compared to our technology.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
|
Link to this post
|
