Mag-nus posted:

---

There are two separate blood drinker 8 spells.
Ones that items cast on themselves.
Ones that you can cast on items.

If a weapon comes with blood drinker 8 on it, it adds 24 damage.

The spell YOU can cast only adds 22 damage.

Thus, its ideal to find weapons that cast BD8 on themselves.

---

immortalbob posted:

---

Mag-nus posted:

---

There are two separate blood drinker 8 spells.
Ones that items cast on themselves.
Ones that you can cast on items.

If a weapon comes with blood drinker 8 on it, it adds 24 damage.

The spell YOU can cast only adds 22 damage.

Thus, its ideal to find weapons that cast BD8 on themselves.

---

It amazes me that no one seems to know this.

---

* Form is now resizable and fields stretch accordingly. posted:

---

---

ColdAvaton posted:

---

Thanks Mag-nus!
I'd love to see an option for including "or" in a salvage rule. Such as material type 1 or 12 or 64 etc. I just hate having so many salvage rules for so many materials...

---

PicaroLC posted:

---

ColdAvaton posted:

---

Thanks Mag-nus!
I'd love to see an option for including "or" in a salvage rule. Such as material type 1 or 12 or 64 etc. I just hate having so many salvage rules for so many materials...

---

FYI: The "OR Group" method I mentioned above would work with anything (even salvage). No need to make any special salvage specific "OR" features.

just trying to help trim down the workload.

-Picaro

---

ColdAvaton posted:

---

Ah you are correct sir Sorry I didn't see it.

---

immortalbob posted:

---

New version of my loot profile here that takes advantage of the new bow rules.

http://www.filesonic.com/file/4153841724/Loot_Snob_V2.utl

---

NobodyPickedThis posted:

---

immortalbob posted:

---

New version of my loot profile here that takes advantage of the new bow rules.

http://www.filesonic.com/file/4153841724/Loot_Snob_V2.utl

---

Any chance you will be re-releasing a new version of your loot snob profile sir? Pretty please?

---

yaroz_vn posted:

---

bob, filesonic doesn't allow sharing of files. Can you use one that does?

---

TehPersianStallion posted:

---

Any chance we can get an update with the new item attributes in it? Like WeaponMasteryCategory etc?

---

immortalbob posted:

---

http://netload.in/dateiFmgOxmh8QJ/Loot%20Snob%20V3.utl.htm

I do want to say that there are a few rules in there that are technically possible, but very rare drop rate. Such as a quad ward(minor major or epic), sure it's possible to have 4 cantrips on a piece, but finding one with 4 wards is rough.

---

PicaroLC posted:

---

Cool, now,,,

Can you have it inscribe said un-tinked loot weapon with the tinks it concluded on using in the order it concluded on using them in for obatining the final calced buffed tinked damage value? Like a recepie. =)

---

Mag-nus posted:

---

Yea, any tinking calculator can tell you the amount of iron/granite to use to get max DoT.

Even if you switch an iron for a granite, or reversed, you'll still come pretty damn close to the original # Mag-Tools gave you.

Also, remember that these #'s do not factor in graveyard damage augs, or rabbits feet.

---

PicaroLC posted:

---

The order does matter.

Applying granite towoards the end of the tinking produces:
Min Max Variance
Looted 23 46 23
Iron 23.5 47 23.5
Iron 24 48 24
Iron 24.5 49 24.5
Iron 25 50 25
Granite 30 50 20
Iron 30.5 51 20.5
Granite 34.6 51 16.4
Iron 35.1 52 16.9

Applying granite at the beginning of the tinkering produces:
Min Max Variance
Looted 23 46 23
Granite 27.6 46 18.4
Iron 28.1 47 18.9
Granite 31.88 47 15.12
Iron 32.38 48 15.62
Iron 32.88 49 16.12
Iron 33.38 50 16.62
Iron 33.88 51 17.12
Iron 34.38 52 17.62

---

immortalbob posted:

---

Any thoughts about adding a rule req that looks for Cov that can be fully unp after 9-10 tinks? This way i don't pass up as much cov with epics/sets

---

TehPersianStallion posted:

---

immortalbob posted:

---

Any thoughts about adding a rule req that looks for Cov that can be fully unp after 9-10 tinks? This way i don't pass up as much cov with epics/sets

---

This is pretty trivial to do. Just add a unenchantable=9999 al > whatever you want, impen 7 or 8 (I'd go 8) and at least 3 banes. That usually can tink to unpar to all.

---

immortalbob posted:

---

TehPersianStallion posted:

---

immortalbob posted:

---

Any thoughts about adding a rule req that looks for Cov that can be fully unp after 9-10 tinks? This way i don't pass up as much cov with epics/sets

---

This is pretty trivial to do. Just add a unenchantable=9999 al > whatever you want, impen 7 or 8 (I'd go 8) and at least 3 banes. That usually can tink to unpar to all.

---

3 banes wont always tink to unpar. It takes a combination of good base prots and preferably physical banes (slash bludge pierce) to make a 3 bane piece go fully unp.

Edit:

It would also take into account the cold/bludge/acid gems from alt currency in it's calculation.

---