Author Topic: Can you explain the performance difference between these three systems?
--Syrus-- 
Posts: 7,711
Registered: Dec 2, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 7,639
User ID: 863,847
Subject: Can you explain the performance difference between these three systems?
So if you have seen my other thread on working out a computer build you know that I am planning on buying a new computer very soon. I'm buying it in anticipation of Battlefield 3 mostly, but more then that I am just feeling the need for an upgrade. My computer is about 4 to 5 years old now.

Here is what I'm running now.

Intel Quad Core 2.4 Ghz, 2 gigs of Ram and an Nvidea GTX 260.

The computer I was thinking of buying would run an

Intel Core i7 - 2600k Sandy Bridge 3.4 GH
2x 4GB Corsair Vengeance 240 PIN DDR3 1600
ENGTX570 Nvidea

I've been told though that I am spending a lot of money for not a huge performance increase. Here is what has been suggested to me

Intel i5 2500K 3.3
Nvidea GTX 460
and then if I drop the SSD I was thinking of getting to just a normal HD it would save me about $500 bucks.

So my question is, should I be bothering to upgrade in the first place? And what kind of a difference am going to see between the two upgrade choices? $500 worth?

Thanks


 

-----signature-----
Common Sense is a myth..
Its Hub. 10 week ban for anybody who disagrees. -Mithan-
Link to this post
Ravynmagi 
Title: Moderator
Posts: 29,978
Registered: Dec 23, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 29,452
User ID: 572,278
Subject: Can you explain the performance difference between these three systems?
The i5-2500K is pretty nice and the i7-2600K adds hyper threading and a little more speed and cache. For gaming alone, I wouldn't really say the 2600K is worth the extra $100 price tag. So I say the i5-2500K is the better bang for the buck for gaming.

The GTX 460 was a nice card. And it's still capable. But if you want a good card for BF3, I'd recommend the GTX 570 easily.

If these are prebuilt systems, then I'd pick the i7-2600K with the GTX 570 over the i5-2500K with the GTX 460, because the 460 is just a little to low end these days. Though I'm saying this being blind to the prices of these systems as well. happy

Q6600 LGA775 socket system probably not worth upgrading at this point. Time to replace it.

 

-----signature-----
(none)
Link to this post
Blisteringballs 
Posts: 2,247
Registered: Aug 12, '09
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 2,247
User ID: 1,366,612
Subject: Can you explain the performance difference between these three systems?
I don't know about the rest, but the 460 will seem perfectly fine but once BF3 and later games drop, you're going to be seeing a big difference compared to the 570. So go with the 570. I'm mulling upgrading to that from a 460 myself.

 

-----signature-----
Link to this post
Karsus_the_Great 
Title: This is a title.
Posts: 1,359
Registered: Apr 12, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 1,331
User ID: 790,358
Subject: Can you explain the performance difference between these three systems?
It' been my experience to build it where you wont regret it later. 460 is a great card but is already a single 460 would struggle with some of the games already out there, much less a year from now.

2500 vs 2600, like RAVY said the real diff is HT, but you will only see a notable diff between the two chips when it comes to multitasking.

It really depends on what you want from your system, and how long before the next upgrade. I would go with the 570 as well. I would go for the 2600k because it will perform as well in games as the 2500, but give you the little boost when you do play a game, web surf, and watch a movie at the same time.

 

-----signature-----
I know I'm going to hell, I'll bring marshmallows.
Caldari. The only race in Eve that does not fly it's own ships.
Karsus the Great - lvl 240+ Original BM(retired)
Link to this post
--Syrus-- 
Posts: 7,711
Registered: Dec 2, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 7,639
User ID: 863,847
Subject: Can you explain the performance difference between these three systems?
These are not pre built system so I can pick and choose my parts. I'm not building it myself, but my local computer shop will put whatever I want into them.

I kind of figured the video card was a bit too much of a drop. I might drop the processor down to save $100, but even at that it might not be worth it in the big picture.

Thanks for the advice guys that really helped out.

 

-----signature-----
Common Sense is a myth..
Its Hub. 10 week ban for anybody who disagrees. -Mithan-
Link to this post
The_Korrigan 
Title: Scrub Buster
Posts: 21,660
Registered: Jul 17, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 21,292
User ID: 255,861
Subject: Can you explain the performance difference between these three systems?
Get an AMD Phenom II X4 system and you'll pay even less, and will still be able to play all modern games with settings maxed out.
And for the graphic card... get yourself an ATI HD6870 or better to go with it.

 

-----signature-----
SWTOR: 50 Jedi Shadow (Tank), 50 Sith Marauder (Annihilation).
LOTRO: Lifetime account, playing very casually.
WoW: Both accounts canceled for now.
GW2: Future Warrior.
Link to this post
Acidspits 
Posts: 1,129
Registered: Mar 29, '07
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 1,128
User ID: 1,214,970
Subject: Can you explain the performance difference between these three systems?
Phenom II X4 processors are really only for the extremely budget limited gamer since Sandy Bridge. I hear more problems from people with ATI cards vs Nvidia cards also.

Just my 2 cents.

 

-----signature-----
Addicted to HoN,
Retired from DAoC
"FREAKIN RIP THESE DICKS OFF ERRR IM ABOUT TO JACK OFF" -__alex
Link to this post

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Powered by PHP