Author Topic: PvP Q&A with Zarhym
Vault_News 
Title: 0110011010
Be Nice to Me I'm a Bot

Posts: 43,785
Registered: Oct 18, '05
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 42,467
User ID: 1,086,234
Subject: PvP Q&A with Zarhym
Zarhym decided on an impromptu Q&A for the PvP Enthusiasts out there:
Q: Given that you are now implementing raid finder tool would you please please implementing similar tool for rated battlegrounds?
A: We can bring this up with the developers. It'd probably have to fundamentally function a bit differently from the Dungeon Finder and proposed Raid Finder though, otherwise a cross-realm random RBG Finder wouldn't differ that much from randomly queuing for a normal Battleground, aside from the fact your team can persist after a battle concludes.

Q: This has been asked many times but is there any status update BoA realm transfer?
A: We also spoke to GC about this again yesterday (we ping him about it a lot). He made it clear that there are no design issues or qualms about allowing this functionality. Instead, it's an issue of programmer bandwidth. Because of the way WoW was originally structured around accounts, followed by the introduction of Battle.net accounts, there's a technical limitation to allowing cross-realm BoAs which has to be overcome by our Battle.net team, not the WoW development team. At the moment that team is incredibly busy building out the Battle.net platform to expand its functionality for World of Warcraft and StarCraft II, and get Diablo III going. We're adamant about making this happen. Unfortunately, I can't really give you a timeline and I know it's already felt too long.

Q: Affliction warlocks and shamans are the main classes doing well in high end and even low end PvP. These classes have far to much synergy and because of this any class combined with them does well, do you have guys have any intention to fix this?
A: Based on my recent conversation with GC, he did mention in particular that a Resto shaman tweak needs to be made. In particular, he's prepared to get his nasty claws on Windshear.

Q: Any chances of bringing back old AV? Seems like most PVPers support this idea.
A: I even ranted to Tom Chilton and Greg Street about this recently. For all the reasons it was wrong, I still loved losing all track of time while involved in an endless -- quite literally -- battle for AV. I loved doing constant suicide runs from SF graveyard on my gnome 'lock just to try and interrupt the Horde summons.

We haven't stopped talking about it. Part of the problem is Battlegrounds are incredibly scripted, to the point they're actually worked on quite a bit by our encounter design team. We need to keep working on new ways of developing Battlegrounds to improve their design.

But, to your point, it's doubtful AV 1.0 will be resurrected, and there's only so much tweaking we can do to try and improve the current one -- we'd be working on very old framework with AV. At this point, it'd probably be easier and produce better results if we started from scratch.

Q: Skirmishes, sir?
A: The last time we talked to the developers about it, they mentioned the possibility of these going back in to compliment War Games. But given they saw very little evidence to suggest coding for Skirmishes paid off for players, it seems a low priority. [..] When designing Cataclysm, we looked at the data and saw an extremely fractional percentage of the entire playerbase actively using Skirmishes. So with all of the other changes happening, along with BG War Games, we decided not to polish up Skirmishes and keep them in.

Q: What your thoughts are on the "Halaa" type zone suggested by other players?
A: Speaking personally, I think they have a good place in WoW and should come back. A place like Halaa doesn't take nearly as much design time as a place like Tol Barad or Wintergrasp, yet the payoff is relatively high. The Tol Barad style is a quite massive undertaking, and ultimately becomes a very contentious PvP content topic, especially when daily quests and raid bosses are at stake.

Q: Bring back world PvP!
A: All I can say for now is that we've driven people to SW/Org in this expansion too much and that's not cool. We want to fix that in the next go.

Q:Any new Battlegrounds for 4.3?
A: We don't have any plans right now to add a new Battleground in patch 4.3.


Posted from WoW Vault

 

-----signature-----
(none)
Link to this post
Spookysheep 
Title: Lieker of Cheese
Posts: 21,595
Registered: Jan 9, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 21,166
User ID: 601,475
Subject: PvP Q&A with Zarhym
Wow, even the Q&A is just an afterthought, just like the pvp grin

 

-----signature-----
I liek cheese
Pirates > Ninjas
.....................................
Link to this post
Rill_of_WE 
Title: WoW Vault Site Manager
Posts: 6,074
Registered: Aug 6, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 6,001
User ID: 703,880
Subject: PvP Q&A with Zarhym

Bot posted:
Q: Bring back world PvP!
A: All I can say for now is that we've driven people to SW/Org in this expansion too much and that's not cool. We want to fix that in the next go.



/significant look at 4.3 Raid Finder


/chuckle

 

-----signature-----
Link to this post
Groooovechampion 
Posts: 4,616
Registered: Jun 30, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 4,485
User ID: 818,115
Subject: PvP Q&A with Zarhym
Next go...................?

 

-----signature-----
DaoC, WoW (retired, inactive); WAR (semi active), EVE (active)
"Ye'know, com'on! Giimmeee di Ke$$$HHHHHH!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OADJl-CVDo0
Link to this post
Kriegprojekt 
Posts: 2,653
Registered: Apr 12, '10
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 2,591
User ID: 1,390,814
Subject: PvP Q&A with Zarhym
Groooovechampion posted:
Next go...................?


Yeah. Looks like they know Cata didnt do well and are pushing the next expansion out ASAP. I wouldnt be surprised if we saw it next year.

 

-----signature-----
http://www.immortal-guild.com/
Deepstrike Server
Milkman - Guardian Bard
Link to this post

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Powered by PHP