Arcilite_I
Title: VN's Most Wanted
Posts:
34,414
Registered:
Jan 27, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 33,674
User ID: 633,598
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
|
Curious
-----signature-----
PvPing since 1977
|
|
Link to this post
|
wowplayer321
Posts:
288
Registered:
May 13, '08
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 285
User ID: 1,296,786
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
No flying? At all?
No BOP items? At all?
I can think of many things Blizz has added over the years.
Flush all that down the toilet?
Yer crazy.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
|
Link to this post
|
Blisteringballs
Posts:
2,247
Registered:
Aug 12, '09
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 2,247
User ID: 1,366,612
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
|
I doubt I would. In hind sight vanilla WoW was a great experience, but if you honestly hold it up against the advances the game has made since then it's really dated and grindy. Even by today's WoW standards.
-----signature-----
|
|
Link to this post
|
Arunne
Title: The Anonymous
Posts:
2,548
Registered:
Nov 3, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 2,526
User ID: 852,899
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
|
Probably not, just cant get excited about going back in time in MMO's.
-----signature-----
"Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be"
"I may not agree with what you say, but I respect your right to be punished for it."
|
|
Link to this post
|
NukeMage
Posts:
3,856
Registered:
Apr 7, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 3,821
User ID: 666,051
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
|
No way
-----signature-----
I need a new hobby . .
Ten level 85's (one of each class) in WoW
Back to try out the Feb patch in AC
|
|
Link to this post
|
vn_vigilante66
Title: GO TEAM VENTURE!
Posts:
22,253
Registered:
Jan 27, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 21,788
User ID: 65,294
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
|
No. Rose colored glasses make it seem like vanilla was better but there are many reasons why its not as good as people make it out ot be
-----signature-----
WoW - Archimonde - Ner'Zhul
All people have evil thoughts, its those that act on these thoughts, that make them evil
I can accept failure. What I cannot accept is not trying.
|
|
Link to this post
|
Quazimortal
Title: The One and Only
Posts:
17,806
Registered:
Sep 18, '04
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 17,157
User ID: 968,129
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
|
Lock it to Wrath content and I'd play it. To hell with everything Cataclysm added.
-----signature-----
“A painter paints his pictures on canvas. But musicians paint their pictures on silence.
We provide the music, and you provide the silence.†~Leopold Stokowski
|
|
Link to this post
|
Bremen_Gaheris
Posts:
1,567
Registered:
Jan 29, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 1,529
User ID: 764,499
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
Quazimortal posted:
Lock it to Wrath content and I'd play it. To hell with everything Cataclysm added.
Agree with Quazi. Classic endgame sucked, seriously. Remember running Scholo and Stratholme over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again just to try to get that last dungeon set piece of shoulders or chest or whatever? Yeah....
People fondly remember great challenges but that is pure nostalgia talking. It was no tougher than current or even WOTLK but was FAR more grindy. BC was leagues better and WOTLK was another order of magnitude better in content and accessibility for players.
-----signature-----
The VNboards are so much fun! Its like my own personal train wreck going 24/7
and noone is actually getting hurt which takes away the guilt of watching.
|
|
Link to this post
|
Arcilite_I
Title: VN's Most Wanted
Posts:
34,414
Registered:
Jan 27, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 33,674
User ID: 633,598
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
|
You think TBC was a jump in accessibility for players? You're out of your f*cking mind...
-----signature-----
PvPing since 1977
|
|
Link to this post
|
Bremen_Gaheris
Posts:
1,567
Registered:
Jan 29, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 1,529
User ID: 764,499
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
Arcilite_I posted:
You think TBC was a jump in accessibility for players? You're out of your f*cking mind...
At release of the BC expac, I 100% agree with you. Heroics were brutal. Kara was ridiculous unless everyone was already decently geared and new exactly what to do. And the 25-mans were whatever they were. I never did any of those.
After all the myriad of nerfs though it was all doable by just about anyone if you wanted to put out the time to put together a group yourself. I guess I should have been more clear about BC but my statement about WOTLK being way more accessible than Classic stands.
-----signature-----
The VNboards are so much fun! Its like my own personal train wreck going 24/7
and noone is actually getting hurt which takes away the guilt of watching.
|
|
Link to this post
|
Blisteringballs
Posts:
2,247
Registered:
Aug 12, '09
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 2,247
User ID: 1,366,612
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
Arcilite_I posted:
You think TBC was a jump in accessibility for players? You're out of your f*cking mind...
Well in some ways it was, because it gave more casual players more to do - generally speaking. There was some massive grinds up ins, but there was also more elaborate quest chains and tons of dailies. It was definitely more accessible than vanilla in comparison.
-----signature-----
|
|
Link to this post
|
Arcilite_I
Title: VN's Most Wanted
Posts:
34,414
Registered:
Jan 27, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 33,674
User ID: 633,598
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
|
I'll agree wholeheartedly with WotLK being the special needs version of WoW.
-----signature-----
PvPing since 1977
|
|
Link to this post
|
-Peo-
Title: Caveat Lector
Posts:
3,208
Registered:
Feb 2, '05
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 3,155
User ID: 1,024,262
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
Arcilite_I posted:
I'll agree wholeheartedly with WotLK being the most fun version of WoW.
Fixed.
-----signature-----
SWTOR, Maybe in a year.
Back to WoW for now.
With a lil f2p CoH.
|
|
Link to this post
|
Auenwing
Title: straightface
Posts:
8,837
Registered:
Dec 27, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 8,717
User ID: 752,779
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
After Cata came out, and there was a lot of negative reaction, my husband chuckled and said, it would merely be a matter of time before Blizzard realized they had gone too far, and would need to pull a "Mythic" and introduce "classic" (Vanilla) servers to draw back/keep a segment of Blizzard's customers.
I think the minute you do that, you are saying the game is dead.
After years of yelling that the hardest part of raiding is organizing 40 people, and having the game move forward towards 5, 10, 20, 25 man content, are there enough large guilds left who would want to return to this style of play? Are there enough players that would be willing to go back to the kind of large guild processing that Vanilla would require?
Are there new players (see: LK and Cat expansions), that would want to see what the fuss/bragging rights was all about?
Top level capped at 60, no arenas, Warlord title PvP system, pallies on Alliance only, shamans on Horde only, no Draenei and Blood Elf races, massive afking in BGs, holy trinity LFG system (all others need not apply) for Strat, etcetera.....
...which features do you also include?
Three types of endgame:
1) 40 man raids
2) rolling new alts (level 1-59 "experience")
3) no sleep slog fests for PvP titles while exploiting the system
I don't think I personally would pay money to come back and play something that was already skewed at the time.
Would I pay to come back to WoW with Cata removed? Maybe. 
Will Blizzard actually implement something like this? If they think they can get bang for buck, just on player's curiosity/nostalgia, even if it's only one-month's subscription? Does that really need an answer?
-----signature-----
There are those who play tank classes, and those that tank.
The weapon is only as good as the person wielding it.
Free advice is often worth what you pay for it: nothing.
|
|
Link to this post
|
Ugh_Lancelot
Title: Ooo...bouncy!
Posts:
5,492
Registered:
Jun 17, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 5,446
User ID: 689,383
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
15-man UBRS again (which wasn't a guaranteed win even with 15)? Yes.
More difficult Strat/Scholo? Yes.
Much less linear questing? Yes.
Real elite world mobs? Yes.
Named quest mobs that required a 3+ group to complete? Yes.
No flight in old world? Yes.
Pre-4.0 (i.e.: non-homogenized/non-dumbed-down) talent trees? Yes.
No resilience? Yes.
No arenas? Yes.
Hunter pets that had a reason to be tamed aside from looks? Yes.
World PVP a la TM/SS? Yes.
Guards/Flight masters that aren't a joke? Yes.
Armor sets that actually look cool? Yes.
Rolling back all the other advances in engine, UI, etc.? No.
-----signature-----
WoW and DAoC - Too many alts to count
Charter Member - Altaholics Anonymous
|
|
Link to this post
|
kyrv
Title: Lord Logicus
Posts:
14,420
Registered:
Jan 31, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 14,357
User ID: 639,081
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
Blisteringballs posted:
I doubt I would. In hind sight vanilla WoW was a great experience, but if you honestly hold it up against the advances the game has made since then it's really dated and grindy. Even by today's WoW standards.
-----signature-----
CO, LOTRO, RoM, PWI, CoH
Dragon Age
|
|
Link to this post
|
Azure-TheBlueOne
Title: Made in Alaska
Posts:
7,936
Registered:
Feb 24, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 7,754
User ID: 773,760
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
|
Vanilla wasn't even that enjoyable. Big no from me. I liked the TBC and WoTLK epochs, personally. Cataclysm isn't that different from Vanilla for me, just somehow more watered down even with 25 more levels on top.
-----signature-----
"When the government scares people into thinking it must take their liberties away, and the people let the Government do it. They are sheep." - Judge Andrew Napolitano http://www.leap.cc/cms/index.php
|
|
Link to this post
|
Bremen_Gaheris
Posts:
1,567
Registered:
Jan 29, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 1,529
User ID: 764,499
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
Arcilite_I posted:
I'll agree wholeheartedly with WotLK being the special needs version of WoW.
Totally agree with you. Not sure if your remark was meant as snarky but I took it as WOTLK was a great expac that catered to all Blizzard's customers. There were raids totally doable by all but with hardcore modes for hardcore folks that wanted an uber challenge. It was good times.
Ugh_Lancelot posted:
15-man UBRS again (which wasn't a guaranteed win even with 15)? Yes.
More difficult Strat/Scholo? Yes.
Much less linear questing? Yes.
Real elite world mobs? Yes.
Named quest mobs that required a 3+ group to complete? Yes.
No flight in old world? Yes.
Pre-4.0 (i.e.: non-homogenized/non-dumbed-down) talent trees? Yes.
No resilience? Yes.
No arenas? Yes.
Hunter pets that had a reason to be tamed aside from looks? Yes.
World PVP a la TM/SS? Yes.
Guards/Flight masters that aren't a joke? Yes.
Armor sets that actually look cool? Yes.
Rolling back all the other advances in engine, UI, etc.? No.
I just want to comment on the talent trees question above. Have you already forgotten about all the classes with a talent tree for healing that their other talent trees were utterly useless? Druids (Feral lol), Paladins (Prot couldn't tank and Ret lol), and Shamans (Enhance only at top gear and Elemental lol) all had the most lackluster and crappy specs besides their healing (even those were pretty terrible) due to Blizzard wanting to force those classes into healing roles.
Nah, Classic sucked ass compared to WOTLK. Cataclysm is even worse though because while the classes are all able to actually use their other roles they can spec for they are so lackluster and boring it is pathetic.
-----signature-----
The VNboards are so much fun! Its like my own personal train wreck going 24/7
and noone is actually getting hurt which takes away the guilt of watching.
|
|
Link to this post
|
Ugh_Lancelot
Title: Ooo...bouncy!
Posts:
5,492
Registered:
Jun 17, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 5,446
User ID: 689,383
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
Note I said "Pre-4.0" talent trees. I played both Feral and Ret in WotLK. I guess I should have clarified that I'd rather have those 3.0 specs back, not classic 1.0 stuff. 
-----signature-----
WoW and DAoC - Too many alts to count
Charter Member - Altaholics Anonymous
|
|
Link to this post
|
Bremen_Gaheris
Posts:
1,567
Registered:
Jan 29, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 1,529
User ID: 764,499
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
Ugh_Lancelot posted:
Note I said "Pre-4.0" talent trees. I played both Feral and Ret in WotLK. I guess I should have clarified that I'd rather have those 3.0 specs back, not classic 1.0 stuff.
I see, totally agreed. 1.0 talents sucked. 3.x talents were pretty darned good and held a ton of versatility and playstyle differences for lots of folks.
-----signature-----
The VNboards are so much fun! Its like my own personal train wreck going 24/7
and noone is actually getting hurt which takes away the guilt of watching.
|
|
Link to this post
|
portablehospital
Posts:
11,684
Registered:
May 25, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 11,128
User ID: 682,529
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
Quazimortal posted:
Lock it to Wrath content and I'd play it. To hell with everything Cataclysm added.
-----signature-----
Forever waiting for a "pvp" game
|
|
Link to this post
|
Spookysheep
Title: Lieker of Cheese
Posts:
21,595
Registered:
Jan 9, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 21,166
User ID: 601,475
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
|
Nope
-----signature-----
I liek cheese
Pirates > Ninjas
.....................................
|
|
Link to this post
|
Ferrydust
Title: Iron Chef Jennifer
Posts:
10,588
Registered:
Sep 4, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 10,382
User ID: 711,372
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
probably not.
-----signature-----
I, on the other hand, prefer a command-line system 'cause i'm so hardcore
/north /north *You encounter an [Avatar of the god Set]!*
/cast sheild *sheild spell unavailable*
/csat shield *csat: unknown command*
*[Avatar of Set] beheads [Peasant]*
|
|
Link to this post
|
Shenron_
Posts:
8,665
Registered:
Dec 8, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 6,513
User ID: 746,590
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
|
-
-----signature-----
(none)
|
|
Link to this post
|
-Mithan-
Title: VNBoard Admin
Posts:
1,000,060,379
Registered:
Mar 1, '00
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 56,880
User ID: 13,156
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
|
lol hell no.
-----signature-----
I survived to the end and got nothing out of it, but hey.
|
|
Link to this post
|
vn_cuch
Posts:
????
Registered:
????
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 0
User ID: 0
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
hell ya!
I would love a "staged" server. ie from vanilla to live but at a fixed pace. Every 6 months(for example) the next "expansion" as it were.
That being said, I am un-subbed, so it is an academic question
-----signature-----
|
|
Link to this post
|
Gr0uch0Marx
Posts:
22
Registered:
Dec 20, '10
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 22
User ID: 1,409,691
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
This is already done in the "underground": one vanilla server, one BC server and one WOTLK server. You just have to download the exact client and version to connect to said server. The problem with these servers is that they are very buggy and half the quests/talents don't work.
I can see Blizzard re-purposing realm hardware as the game winds down for a project like this. That being said: I would probably re-signup for a Blizzard created BC/WOTLK only realm.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
|
Link to this post
|
Groooovechampion
Posts:
4,616
Registered:
Jun 30, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 4,485
User ID: 818,115
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
More likely I'd join.
I'm not surprised that this question was posted. Daoc did something similar (with some exceptions).
-----signature-----
DaoC, WoW (retired, inactive); WAR (semi active), EVE (active) "Ye'know, com'on! Giimmeee di Ke$$$HHHHHH!" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OADJl-CVDo0
|
|
Link to this post
|
Sprawl-zero1eye-
Title: IGN Vault Staff
Reziztance iz Futile
Posts:
53,263
Registered:
Jun 28, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 52,657
User ID: 692,733
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
|
40-man raids? Ugh no thanks. 25-mans are already 24 too many at times.
-----signature-----
Mirkwood MUD, OneEye IvoryFang, Lord of the VampireZ (Retired) AC Frostfell, Clan Z - Lvl 239 Grief Dagger (Retired) WoW Lightbringer Alliance, Z Guild - Lvl 85 Combat Rogue (Retired) Making iOS Apps these days at http://zsprawl.com/iOS
|
|
Link to this post
|
Nakal
Title: Moderator
Bad Moogle
Posts:
19,542
Registered:
Jul 9, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 19,238
User ID: 695,821
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
|
Dont forget the flight paths where you landed and had to buy your next trip.... no AFKs for you...!I Did like 15 man UBRS though.
-----signature-----
Currently in the MMO unemployment line.
Can I get $15/month for not playing them?
|
|
Link to this post
|
OldBitterCraig
Title: EXTERMINATE!
Posts:
9,547
Registered:
Aug 22, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 9,357
User ID: 708,313
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
nope. agree wiht the LK sentiment, though. that was fun... i had not tired.
hate so many cata bits that only my desire for 100 mounts and 100,000 hks on one toon is keeping me in the game at present.
-----signature-----
85 everything. weeee.
.
i've always been a nobody, i'll never be a somebody
unless i kick some ass or get drink with the umbrella in it.
|
|
Link to this post
|
Elaok
Title: I has title now!
Posts:
9,497
Registered:
Sep 10, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 9,208
User ID: 837,259
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
Vanilla? no i leveled my warlock up in Vanilla i don't think i could do 1-60 again like that..
BC? maybe...
WOTLK? sure why not i had the most fun playing WOTLK expansion moer than the others and anything to get rid of the current expansion
-----signature-----
(none)
|
|
Link to this post
|
Auenwing
Title: straightface
Posts:
8,837
Registered:
Dec 27, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 8,717
User ID: 752,779
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
Sprawl-zero1eye- posted:
40-man raids? Ugh no thanks. 25-mans are already 24 too many at times.
/crawls back onto chair
-----signature-----
There are those who play tank classes, and those that tank.
The weapon is only as good as the person wielding it.
Free advice is often worth what you pay for it: nothing.
|
|
Link to this post
|
Rill_of_WE
Title: WoW Vault Site Manager
Posts:
6,074
Registered:
Aug 6, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 6,001
User ID: 703,880
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
|
I would not. I might dabble on it just for nostalgia's sake. But since my favorite class/spec is ret paladin, I'd rather lock it to BC or WotLK when it was more fun to play.
-----signature-----
|
|
Link to this post
|
sarnsereg
Title: I HAS A TITLE?
Posts:
18,092
Registered:
Jun 17, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 17,296
User ID: 163,596
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
While I have some very fond memeories of vanilla(even beta) I wouldn't play on a vanilla locked server. Well, maybe for a little bit, but I wouldn't stay long enough to make it worth them opening one.
I loved 40 man raids, they were fun and challenging and really felt like an accomplishment. The newer styles (10 and 25) don't seem to provide me with the same sense of fulfillment that the 40 man raids did when we down bosses. It's still fun and enjoyable but something about 40 people going into an instance and coordinating everything was truely epic in the sense of a "raid".
That being said.... I hated grinding mobs for items to sell to have enough gold to buy a 100% speed LAND mount (it took me a long time to grind the money out for the 1,000G when i was lucky to get an item that was like a 15s vendor price). I enjoy being able to fly everywhere now. I remember getting my Dungeon set and enjoyed it, but as it has already been brought up you ran the same one or two instances at a point hoping to get that last piece (and i had it all.. forl ike 2 weeks until i started upgrading with MC pieces, then with BWD pieces until i had all the BWD stuff, then was about to staart upgrading naxx pieces, but only got one piece and didn't want to lose my set bonus from my BWD piece)
That and the talent trees and everything are so different now and I like it the way they are now. My druid can legitimatly tank, dps, or heal where in vanilla you healed and that was that, paladins were cleanse bots and that was that, shamans were healers and that was that, warriors were tanks and you tanked or you didn't do anything, priests were healers and shadow was laughed at other than for leveling purposes, etc. etc.
Anyways, just some of the reasons as to why I wouldn't play a server locked to vanilla content.
-----signature-----
"...and they'll say "Hey, Look at him!, I'll never live that way". And that's ok they couldn't anyway..."
|
|
Link to this post
|
Tai-Daishar_MT
Title: Moderator
Troll Eradicator
Posts:
18,124
Registered:
Mar 9, '00
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 16,150
User ID: 14,326
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
|
Not a chance. Wrath was good times (before the buff got too high) so it is a bit of a bummer at the letdown known as cat.
-----signature-----
Fare thee well VN, Vini, Vidi, Vici!
|
|
Link to this post
|
siujoey
Posts:
4,944
Registered:
Dec 26, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 4,893
User ID: 575,651
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
|
I'm with Quazi. Since I don't need to seek validation from the game by feeling like I "achieved" something, I would play the expansion that I had the most fun in. That would be WotLK. Easy or not, special needs or not- that was fun, and that's what I am looking for from a game.
-----signature-----
I'm the Dude. So that's what you call me. You know, that or, uh, His Dudeness, or uh, Duder, or El Duderino if you're not into the whole brevity thing.
|
|
Link to this post
|
Broken_Kayfabe
Posts:
9,125
Registered:
Feb 16, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 9,010
User ID: 646,295
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
Not original. TBC or WotLK maybe. However with the butchered community and no sense of world anymore thanks to integrating all the servers and turning everything into random queues, I can't see either of those either. Now a WotLK or TBC without server integration - mm that would be tempting.
-----signature-----
Thanks, but it's been fun
Five more minutes then I'm done!
I've been saying that to myself since
...yesterday.
- from "Has anybody seen my corpse". Man Everquest rocked back in the day...
|
|
Link to this post
|
Spookysheep
Title: Lieker of Cheese
Posts:
21,595
Registered:
Jan 9, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 21,166
User ID: 601,475
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
|
I would play on a WOTLK server, especially if they made it co-op.
-----signature-----
I liek cheese
Pirates > Ninjas
.....................................
|
|
Link to this post
|
_Kewk_
Title: Sith Lord
Posts:
10,167
Registered:
Dec 17, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 9,952
User ID: 749,729
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
Arcilite_I posted:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
No
-----signature-----
(none)
|
|
Link to this post
|
cccn714
Posts:
6
Registered:
Jul 21, '10
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 6
User ID: 1,398,769
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
Quazimortal posted:
Lock it to Wrath content and I'd play it. To hell with everything Cataclysm added.
I total agree with Quaz, Not too fond of Cata myself and love'd the way Wrath played. I def could play that one locked.
-----signature-----
(none)
|
|
Link to this post
|
Alpha_Swift
Posts:
5,821
Registered:
Jul 16, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 5,744
User ID: 697,744
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
No. Now give me a chance to get off of your lawn.
-----signature-----
-
-
-
Can someone please answer Fermi's Paradox?
|
|
Link to this post
|
Stalker_Moonshadow
Posts:
12,589
Registered:
Sep 28, '00
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 12,065
User ID: 46,531
|
Subject:
Would you play a server locked to vanilla content only?
|
|
Cata wouldn't be so bad if the lvel 80 'starter' zones didn't have so much scripted content. I just @#$%king hate that!
-----signature-----
Earth First!
We can mine and log the other planets later...
|
|
Link to this post
|
