Author Topic: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
Ferrydust 
Title: Iron Chef Jennifer
Posts: 10,588
Registered: Sep 4, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 10,382
User ID: 711,372
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
snippet from PTR Build 14199, Patch 4.2


If a player wins a Need roll under the Need Before Greed system on a Bind on Equip item, the item will become Soulbound to that player. The item will remain unbound if won via a Greed roll.

 

-----signature-----
I, on the other hand, prefer a command-line system 'cause i'm so hardcore
/north /north *You encounter an [Avatar of the god Set]!*
/cast sheild *sheild spell unavailable*
/csat shield *csat: unknown command*
*[Avatar of Set] beheads [Peasant]*
Link to this post
JaredKorry 
Posts: ????
Registered: ????
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 0
User ID: 0
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
That's a great change. Keeps people from taking BOE items just to sell.

 

-----signature-----
Link to this post
Elaok 
Title: I has title now!
Posts: 9,497
Registered: Sep 10, '03
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 9,208
User ID: 837,259
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
that is a fantastic change


so many times everyone just rolls need on the item just cause its worth 1-2k on AH while one guy could actually use it

 

-----signature-----
(none)
Link to this post
Ferrydust 
Title: Iron Chef Jennifer
Posts: 10,588
Registered: Sep 4, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 10,382
User ID: 711,372
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
JaredKorry posted:
That's a great change. Keeps people from taking BOE items just to sell.


Here is what I see happening.

person 1-4 roll /greed
person 5 rolls /need (whether he needs it or not) and /leaves the group. /vendors it.

Because people are just mean that way sad

 

-----signature-----
I, on the other hand, prefer a command-line system 'cause i'm so hardcore
/north /north *You encounter an [Avatar of the god Set]!*
/cast sheild *sheild spell unavailable*
/csat shield *csat: unknown command*
*[Avatar of Set] beheads [Peasant]*
Link to this post
-Peo- 
Title: Caveat Lector
Posts: 3,208
Registered: Feb 2, '05
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 3,155
User ID: 1,024,262
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
Ferrydust posted:
JaredKorry posted:
That's a great change. Keeps people from taking BOE items just to sell.


Here is what I see happening.

person 1-4 roll /greed
person 5 rolls /need (whether he needs it or not) and /leaves the group. /vendors it.

Because people are just mean that way sad




Good, anything that makes douchebags leave my group is a plus.

 

-----signature-----
SWTOR, Maybe in a year.
Back to WoW for now.
With a lil f2p CoH.
Link to this post
Alpha_Swift 
Posts: 5,821
Registered: Jul 16, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 5,744
User ID: 697,744
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)

For once, a welcome change.

 

-----signature-----
-
-
-
Can someone please answer Fermi's Paradox?
Link to this post
_Kewk_ 
Title: Sith Lord
Posts: 10,167
Registered: Dec 17, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 9,952
User ID: 749,729
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
Ferrydust posted:
snippet from PTR Build 14199, Patch 4.2


If a player wins a Need roll under the Need Before Greed system on a Bind on Equip item, the item will become Soulbound to that player. The item will remain unbound if won via a Greed roll.




Sounds perfectly reasonable to me.

 

-----signature-----
(none)
Link to this post
JaredKorry 
Posts: ????
Registered: ????
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 0
User ID: 0
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
Ferrydust posted:
JaredKorry posted:
That's a great change. Keeps people from taking BOE items just to sell.


Here is what I see happening.

person 1-4 roll /greed
person 5 rolls /need (whether he needs it or not) and /leaves the group. /vendors it.

Because people are just mean that way sad




Better then him rolling need and then leaving group to go make a few thousand on the AH.

 

-----signature-----
Link to this post
Sprawl-zero1eye- 
Title: IGN Vault Staff
Reziztance iz Futile

Posts: 53,263
Registered: Jun 28, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 52,657
User ID: 692,733
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
Seemed odd at first, but it makes perfect sense.

 

-----signature-----
Mirkwood MUD, OneEye IvoryFang, Lord of the VampireZ (Retired)
AC Frostfell, Clan Z - Lvl 239 Grief Dagger (Retired)
WoW Lightbringer Alliance, Z Guild - Lvl 85 Combat Rogue (Retired)
Making iOS Apps these days at http://zsprawl.com/iOS
Link to this post
NukeMage 
Posts: 3,856
Registered: Apr 7, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 3,821
User ID: 666,051
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
Now, if they could only make it to where that BOE could only be Needed by a person if that item was for their class or profession, it would be a total win!

 

-----signature-----
I need a new hobby . .
Ten level 85's (one of each class) in WoW
Back to try out the Feb patch in AC
Link to this post
bazmanhk 
Posts: ????
Registered: ????
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 0
User ID: 0
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
They also need to make it undisenchantable/unvendorable if Need rolled.

But truth is, you wouldn't want to pug ZA/ZG anyway.

 

-----signature-----
Link to this post
GutterSludge 
Posts: 4,620
Registered: Nov 6, '05
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 4,545
User ID: 1,091,587
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
Ferrydust posted:
JaredKorry posted:
That's a great change. Keeps people from taking BOE items just to sell.


Here is what I see happening.

person 1-4 roll /greed
person 5 rolls /need (whether he needs it or not) and /leaves the group. /vendors it.

Because people are just mean that way sad





If they needed it, why didn't they roll need?


Kinda like frost orbs used to be...everyone just rolled need, to keep from being shafted by the last person...(before they changed it, of course)

 

-----signature-----
Guttersludge
People just can't handle the truth.
NeMeFieD said:"Yea I Ucmed for 12 days straight.."
njwCSUS posted:I'm homosexual, so really, its ongoing sexual attraction to my father, not my mother.
Link to this post
kyrv 
Title: Lord Logicus
Posts: 14,420
Registered: Jan 31, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 14,357
User ID: 639,081
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
They really need to learn from other games.

While it would be somewhat tricky on some item, some items you just plain can't use the item, you, duh, don't get the need option.

Pretty simple, items are specifically made for certain classes or builds.

Other game(s) are already doing this.

Somewhat okay change, it will help the 'honest' people who 'need' it for an alt, but greedy people will just sell it faster than before but for less coin. It's still plus coin for them, no effort.

 

-----signature-----
CO, LOTRO, RoM, PWI, CoH
Dragon Age
Link to this post
Trigeminal 
Title: Drill, Fill, Bill
Posts: 11,233
Registered: Mar 17, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 11,153
User ID: 658,468
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
Great change.

 

-----signature-----
PvPing since 1975
Link to this post
Ugh_Lancelot 
Title: Ooo...bouncy!
Posts: 5,492
Registered: Jun 17, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 5,446
User ID: 689,383
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
JaredKorry posted:
Ferrydust posted:
JaredKorry posted:
That's a great change. Keeps people from taking BOE items just to sell.


Here is what I see happening.

person 1-4 roll /greed
person 5 rolls /need (whether he needs it or not) and /leaves the group. /vendors it.

Because people are just mean that way sad




Better then him rolling need and then leaving group to go make a few thousand on the AH.
QFT.

 

-----signature-----
WoW and DAoC - Too many alts to count
Charter Member - Altaholics Anonymous
Link to this post
Talehon69 
Title: Anonymous Entity
Posts: 21,964
Registered: Dec 11, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 21,660
User ID: 747,548
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
If people will seriously ninja-Need on an item to make 5-20g, they are retarded. Let them do it and leave, they were probably only doing 3-4k DPS anyways,

 

-----signature-----
Link to this post
Zero_Washu 
Posts: 13,401
Registered: Sep 28, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 13,151
User ID: 419,410
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
Mage in my former guild used to do that on that one cloth epic that dropped all the time. Hell, I think he sold four or five of them

 

-----signature-----
.
.
. For everything there is a season, and a time for every purpose under heaven
. Cows go moo, Dogs go woof and MMO players go ''PVP is imbalanced''
. "I’m as horny as the hat rack at a Viking bar.", Ann Coulter
Link to this post
Blisteringballs 
Posts: 2,247
Registered: Aug 12, '09
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 2,247
User ID: 1,366,612
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
This won't change anything, people will just need roll and vendor it.

They need to lock out gear rolls given a person's current spec. But addressing the root of the problem isn't a strong suit of the B-Team.

 

-----signature-----
Link to this post
Spookysheep 
Title: Lieker of Cheese
Posts: 21,595
Registered: Jan 9, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 21,166
User ID: 601,475
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
Blisteringballs posted:
This won't change anything, people will just need roll and vendor it.

They need to lock out gear rolls given a person's current spec. But addressing the root of the problem isn't a strong suit of the B-Team.



^^^^^

 

-----signature-----
I liek cheese
Pirates > Ninjas
.....................................
Link to this post
Ugh_Lancelot 
Title: Ooo...bouncy!
Posts: 5,492
Registered: Jun 17, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 5,446
User ID: 689,383
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
Spookysheep posted:
Blisteringballs posted:
They need to lock out gear rolls given a person's current spec. But addressing the root of the problem isn't a strong suit of the B-Team.



^^^^^
Ya know, now that I think about it, that wouldn't be such a bad solution. It's not like you can't trade the item to someone else if they ask nicely.

 

-----signature-----
WoW and DAoC - Too many alts to count
Charter Member - Altaholics Anonymous
Link to this post
Fist_de_Yuma 
Posts: 24,444
Registered: Dec 20, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 21,971
User ID: 566,471
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
This might work. An item that sells for 1,000 gold on AH is hard to pass up. Even honest people have a failures in judgement with that much to gain. When it is a 20g vender profit most will play it right. Sure, there are a lot of slime out there. I lost a top LK tanking sword to hunters four times. Never did get that sword for my tank. This will limit if not stop the abuse.

 

-----signature-----
There are three kind of liberals;
Stupid, ignorant or evil
The result is always evil but the intent is not always evil. Not that it makes much difference in the long run.
No one here is exactly as they seem. - G'Kar
Link to this post
-Peo- 
Title: Caveat Lector
Posts: 3,208
Registered: Feb 2, '05
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 3,155
User ID: 1,024,262
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
Meh, 1k gold is like 45 minutes of farming, tops. Being a douche is a life long dilemma.

 

-----signature-----
SWTOR, Maybe in a year.
Back to WoW for now.
With a lil f2p CoH.
Link to this post
TruthyID 
Posts: 365
Registered: Jul 7, '10
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 365
User ID: 1,397,686
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
Blisteringballs posted:
This won't change anything, people will just need roll and vendor it.


I really hope you're wrong about this. It's just so pathetic to cheat people to get a few pieces of worthless virtual currency. Unfortunately, the WoW community does seem to prove cynical predictions like this right over and over again. Sad.

 

-----signature-----
(none)
Link to this post
GutterSludge 
Posts: 4,620
Registered: Nov 6, '05
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 4,545
User ID: 1,091,587
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
As long as one person gets an item, and the other 4 don't, someone will bitch, moan, and cry that "they" should have gotten it...for whatever reason...


This will never stop without a major overhaul to the loot system mentality of this game..


 

-----signature-----
Guttersludge
People just can't handle the truth.
NeMeFieD said:"Yea I Ucmed for 12 days straight.."
njwCSUS posted:I'm homosexual, so really, its ongoing sexual attraction to my father, not my mother.
Link to this post
Shenron_ 
Posts: 8,665
Registered: Dec 8, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 6,513
User ID: 746,590
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
-

 

-----signature-----
(none)
Link to this post
Ugh_Lancelot 
Title: Ooo...bouncy!
Posts: 5,492
Registered: Jun 17, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 5,446
User ID: 689,383
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
Shenron_ posted:
i think its a good change. but i think the idea of filtering items based on your current spec is dumb and will never happen. would contradict the whole idea of dual spec. i roll for offspec stuff all the time...the idea not to do that is just thought up by lootwhores. everyone in the group particpated up to that point so they should have the right to roll on anything that they want and can use...not what other people think they should use
Did you read the rest of this thread or just the first post? confused

 

-----signature-----
WoW and DAoC - Too many alts to count
Charter Member - Altaholics Anonymous
Link to this post
Ashmaele 
Title: Pastor of Muppets
Posts: 19,662
Registered: Jan 15, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 15,903
User ID: 612,352
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
Anonymous posted:
^^^^

Actually, I've *never* rolled for an item I can't directly use in the hopes of garnering some gold. I welcome a change where if you can't use it at all then you can't roll on it. Period.


I don't like this. For every dickhead rolling "need" on an item just to AH it, there might be 5-10 honestly players rolling "greed" on an item in the hopes of winning it and transferring it to an alt who might be able to use it either to wear or DE. Sure, some people run dungeons for the heck of it or to help friends/guildmates, but let's face it, most people are there for the lewtz. I don't think any change that results in even longer dungeon queue times is a good one.

 

-----signature-----
I had a dream. It was an incredible dream. When I awoke, I had a huge mess to clean up.
hugs
Link to this post
Ugh_Lancelot 
Title: Ooo...bouncy!
Posts: 5,492
Registered: Jun 17, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 5,446
User ID: 689,383
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
Ashmaele posted:
Anonymous posted:
^^^^

Actually, I've *never* rolled for an item I can't directly use in the hopes of garnering some gold. I welcome a change where if you can't use it at all then you can't roll on it. Period.


I don't like this. For every dickhead rolling "need" on an item just to AH it, there might be 5-10 honestly players rolling "greed" on an item in the hopes of winning it and transferring it to an alt who might be able to use it either to wear or DE. Sure, some people run dungeons for the heck of it or to help friends/guildmates, but let's face it, most people are there for the lewtz. I don't think any change that results in even longer dungeon queue times is a good one.

Nice necro, btw.

I disagree with your assertion that most folks are in an instance for the loot. I think the last time I ran an instance and really cared about loot was in BC. In WotLK and forward, badge gear and crafted epics rendered most of the stuff that drops outside of heroics/raids a waste of energy to quibble over.

 

-----signature-----
WoW and DAoC - Too many alts to count
Charter Member - Altaholics Anonymous
Link to this post
dkdimmesdale 
Posts: ????
Registered: ????
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 0
User ID: 0
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
i support the change, there's only so much blizzard can do to stop ninjaing. at least they are trying.

 

-----signature-----
Link to this post
Ashmaele 
Title: Pastor of Muppets
Posts: 19,662
Registered: Jan 15, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 15,903
User ID: 612,352
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
Ugh_Lancelot posted:
Ashmaele posted:
Anonymous posted:
^^^^

Actually, I've *never* rolled for an item I can't directly use in the hopes of garnering some gold. I welcome a change where if you can't use it at all then you can't roll on it. Period.


I don't like this. For every dickhead rolling "need" on an item just to AH it, there might be 5-10 honestly players rolling "greed" on an item in the hopes of winning it and transferring it to an alt who might be able to use it either to wear or DE. Sure, some people run dungeons for the heck of it or to help friends/guildmates, but let's face it, most people are there for the lewtz. I don't think any change that results in even longer dungeon queue times is a good one.

Nice necro, btw.

I disagree with your assertion that most folks are in an instance for the loot. I think the last time I ran an instance and really cared about loot was in BC. In WotLK and forward, badge gear and crafted epics rendered most of the stuff that drops outside of heroics/raids a waste of energy to quibble over.


Meh, I dunno. I think the group you're speaking of applies mostly to people who are in strong guilds. People who are in weak/small guilds or who aren't guilded at all tend to be the most vocal about drops (at least in my experience). My frost mage is an example of this. My guild is tiny and has no crafters. I have little gold (level 70) so I started doing WOTLK dailies as soon as I could just to get geared quickly.

 

-----signature-----
I had a dream. It was an incredible dream. When I awoke, I had a huge mess to clean up.
hugs
Link to this post
Ugh_Lancelot 
Title: Ooo...bouncy!
Posts: 5,492
Registered: Jun 17, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 5,446
User ID: 689,383
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
Ashmaele posted:
Meh, I dunno. I think the group you're speaking of applies mostly to people who are in strong guilds. People who are in weak/small guilds or who aren't guilded at all tend to be the most vocal about drops (at least in my experience). My frost mage is an example of this. My guild is tiny and has no crafters. I have little gold (level 70) so I started doing WOTLK dailies as soon as I could just to get geared quickly.

You may have a point. The folks I ran with were reliable and could clear Gundrak/DTK heroics as soon as they finished up the Icecrown quest lines, basically with the only blues they had being quest rewards and blue faction gear from Ebon Blade and a couple of the other Northrend factions.

 

-----signature-----
WoW and DAoC - Too many alts to count
Charter Member - Altaholics Anonymous
Link to this post
Shenron_ 
Posts: 8,665
Registered: Dec 8, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 6,513
User ID: 746,590
Subject: This won't end well imo... (Need before Greed change)
-

 

-----signature-----
(none)
Link to this post

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Powered by PHP