RalltirNalius
Posts:
8,956
Registered:
Sep 30, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 8,288
User ID: 722,086
|
Subject:
Which Canon lenses to take on Alaskan Cruise?
|
I am going on an Alaskan cruise in May and am trying to decide which lenses to buy. I'm looking for suggesstions/feedback on what to consider.
Background:
-I will be using a Crop Camera Lens (Rebel T1i)
-I'd like to keep it to 2-3 lenses max
-Budget $2,000.00. Max
-I would like the ability to take wide angle and telephoto shots.
So far I have considered:
EF-S18-200mmf/3.5-5.6 IS, $600.00
EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, $800.00
EF70-200mmf/4L IS USM, $1,300.00
I like the idea of the 18-200 because I wouldn't have to swap out lenses and it's a good value. Would it be worth shelling out another $800.00 to get some ultra wide shots of Alaskan landscapes/downtown Seattle?
Would I see much difference in the 70-200 f/4 IS? I've heard that the f/2.8 is the best lens, but it's out of my budget so I can't decide if it would be worth spending that much money on the f/4 if it's only going to be marginally better than the 18-200mm. If I went this route I could still consider the 10-22 and could always use the 18-55 kit lens for indoor room shots where the 70mm was too close.
Any feedback greatly appreciated!
-----signature-----
DAOC - Ralltir, The Friendly 2Hand Thrust Paladin!
<Knight Templars> RR9 Lion Knight
|
|
Link to this post
|
-Dirtbrother-
Posts:
4,101
Registered:
Sep 21, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 3,491
User ID: 718,876
|
Subject:
Which Canon lenses to take on Alaskan Cruise?
|
A lot of people think the 70-200 f4 is one of the sharpest lenses Canon makes. Personally, I would try and find a used 70-200 2.8 without IS. The combination of wide aperture and decent high ISO of modern cameras should give you a fast enough shutter in most situations that the IS isn't needed.
Personally I would go with used lenses. If you dig around you could probably get the 70-200 2.8 and something like the 24-70L or 17-55IS for 2k or less used. Or if you don't mind third party lenses you can get even more bang for your buck.
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/board/10 is where you want to look for used lenses at good prices.
-----signature-----
|
|
Link to this post
|
Nakal
Title: Moderator
Bad Moogle
Posts:
19,542
Registered:
Jul 9, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 19,238
User ID: 695,821
|
Subject:
Which Canon lenses to take on Alaskan Cruise?
|
|
I have the 70-200 2.8 sans IS and it is a very very sharp lens. Highly recommended.
-----signature-----
Currently in the MMO unemployment line.
Can I get $15/month for not playing them?
|
|
Link to this post
|
RalltirNalius
Posts:
8,956
Registered:
Sep 30, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 8,288
User ID: 722,086
|
Subject:
Which Canon lenses to take on Alaskan Cruise?
|
|
What about thoughts on wide angles for landscape? Is 18mm enough? Is the 70-200 range going to be long enough for Alaska? I was also looking at renting a 100-400mm or buying a 75-300mm IS 4.5-5.6
-----signature-----
DAOC - Ralltir, The Friendly 2Hand Thrust Paladin!
<Knight Templars> RR9 Lion Knight
|
|
Link to this post
|
tsingtao2
Posts:
15,770
Registered:
Oct 10, '00
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 15,298
User ID: 48,832
|
Subject:
Which Canon lenses to take on Alaskan Cruise?
|
|
I was going to also suggest the 70-200mm 2.8 IS USED. My local photo shop has them regularly for 1300-1500. The MK I, not the II.
-----signature-----
May the bridges I burn light my way
Isolated in defiance, I will remain
May the bridges I burn light my way
I will never comply, I'll forever defy
|
|
Link to this post
|
-Dirtbrother-
Posts:
4,101
Registered:
Sep 21, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 3,491
User ID: 718,876
|
Subject:
Which Canon lenses to take on Alaskan Cruise?
|
If you think the 70-200 is too short you could put a 1.4 or 2x extender on it for some extra reach and versatility. As for wide angles, I have never owned a super wide myself but After having a kit lens and now a tamron 17-50 2.8 I think 17 is plenty wide for me. It's also really easy to get distortion with super wides and fisheyes. I would only drop the money on one if I were planning on doing a lot of tight interior shots or architecture shots where you don't have the room to back up.
-----signature-----
|
|
Link to this post
|
RalltirNalius
Posts:
8,956
Registered:
Sep 30, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 8,288
User ID: 722,086
|
Subject:
Which Canon lenses to take on Alaskan Cruise?
|
Thanks guys, I think I am leaning save $$ and rent a 100-400mm for $140.00 and then either get a 18-200mm 3.5-5.6 for everything else, or consider buying the 17-55mm 2.8. I just don't think getting a 10-22mm that would be slightly wider is worth the money for the few shots it might get me.
Other than at night/low light inside the cruise ship will I see much of a difference in the 17-55 vs the 18-200?
-----signature-----
DAOC - Ralltir, The Friendly 2Hand Thrust Paladin!
<Knight Templars> RR9 Lion Knight
|
|
Link to this post
|
-Dirtbrother-
Posts:
4,101
Registered:
Sep 21, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 3,491
User ID: 718,876
|
Subject:
Which Canon lenses to take on Alaskan Cruise?
|
The super zooms are generally regarded as convenient travel lenses but many are notoriously soft until stopped down to f8 or so. The Canon version of the 17-55 is considered to basically be L quality equivalent and would probably produce sharper pictures at f3.5 to f4 plus the option of going to f2.8. I got my Tamron 17-50 2.8 for about 300 used and find it plenty sharp to suit my needs. My Sigma 70-300 is pretty hit or miss wide open.
I'd probably rent the 100-400 and a standard zoom before buying a wide-tele super zoom.
-----signature-----
|
|
Link to this post
|
RalltirNalius
Posts:
8,956
Registered:
Sep 30, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 8,288
User ID: 722,086
|
Subject:
Which Canon lenses to take on Alaskan Cruise?
|
As I am looking, I am stuck again... Should I go 17-55mm 2.8 or 24-70mm 2.8?
The 24-100mm 4.0 seems interesting, but like it might be too much of a compromise since it is not 2.8
-----signature-----
DAOC - Ralltir, The Friendly 2Hand Thrust Paladin!
<Knight Templars> RR9 Lion Knight
|
|
Link to this post
|
AxeonLC
Title: Drifting the Learning Curve
Posts:
38,145
Registered:
Oct 12, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 37,053
User ID: 456,573
|
Subject:
Which Canon lenses to take on Alaskan Cruise?
|
|
24-70 f2.8 is one of the greatest lenses of all time. Period.
-----signature-----
Clubbing Baby Seals since 84' *club club*
British Columbia, Canada.
|
|
Link to this post
|
RalltirNalius
Posts:
8,956
Registered:
Sep 30, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 8,288
User ID: 722,086
|
Subject:
Which Canon lenses to take on Alaskan Cruise?
|
|
Even on a crop camera?
-----signature-----
DAOC - Ralltir, The Friendly 2Hand Thrust Paladin!
<Knight Templars> RR9 Lion Knight
|
|
Link to this post
|
deadcactus
Posts:
38,266
Registered:
Dec 27, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 37,437
User ID: 577,555
|
Subject:
Which Canon lenses to take on Alaskan Cruise?
|
I'm actually in the process of selling my 24-70 2.8L in hope of buying the 17-55. The L lens is an awesome lens, but I just felt like the 17-55mm is a better lens for my needs.
I find myself doing a lot of wide angle shots in crappy lighting with no tripod. Beyond that, my camera gets most of its use during travel so I find the smaller size and lighter weight to be a huge plus.
And maybe it's stupid, but going back to the travel thing, I find not having a red ring advertising the $1k+ price tag of my lens to be a plus...
-----signature-----
'member dat?
True dat.
|
|
Link to this post
|
RalltirNalius
Posts:
8,956
Registered:
Sep 30, '02
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 8,288
User ID: 722,086
|
Subject:
Which Canon lenses to take on Alaskan Cruise?
|
Yeah, I am leaning towards the 17-55mm, or perhaps the 15-85mm. I just now stumbled across it and it sounds like it would be a really nice lens, with better wide angle shots. If it has a 2.8 or a 3.0 fixed aperature it would be a done deal.
Decisions!
-----signature-----
DAOC - Ralltir, The Friendly 2Hand Thrust Paladin!
<Knight Templars> RR9 Lion Knight
|
|
Link to this post
|
AxeonLC
Title: Drifting the Learning Curve
Posts:
38,145
Registered:
Oct 12, '01
Extended Info (if available)
Real Post Cnt: 37,053
User ID: 456,573
|
Subject:
Which Canon lenses to take on Alaskan Cruise?
|
I've used my 24-70 on 1.6x crop bodies and still loved it. But then again, I dont shoot many ultra wide photos when traveling, or if I do, I throw on a 16-35 f2.8.
-----signature-----
Clubbing Baby Seals since 84' *club club*
British Columbia, Canada.
|
|
Link to this post
|
